State of Iowa v. Johnny Ahman Madison
15-2069
| Iowa Ct. App. | Jul 19, 2017Background
- State trooper stopped vehicle driven by Johnny Madison; search uncovered marijuana on center console, residue in back seat, and two bags inside Madison’s shoes.
- Madison was charged with possession of a controlled substance (marijuana), first offense, and convicted by a jury.
- Trial court gave a standard possession instruction defining both actual and constructive possession and stating "possession includes actual as well as constructive possession."
- Madison’s trial counsel did not object to the inclusion of "actual possession" in the jury instruction.
- On appeal Madison argued counsel was ineffective for failing to object because the evidence allegedly did not support actual possession.
- The State argued, and the prosecutor emphasized at closing, that only constructive possession was at issue.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to object to inclusion of "actual possession" in the jury instruction | The State relied on standard instruction; prosecutor prosecuted constructive possession | Madison: evidence did not support actual possession, so instruction should not have included that term; counsel had duty to object | No ineffective assistance: even assuming instruction was unsupported as to actual possession, prosecutor expressly limited theory to constructive possession at closing, so no prejudice under Strickland |
| Whether other potential ineffective-assistance claims should be addressed on direct appeal | State: record is adequate only for the raised claim; other claims can be preserved | Madison: requests preservation/consideration of any additional claims not apparent in record | Court declined to act; such claims need not be raised on direct appeal and may be pursued in postconviction relief |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Maxwell, 743 N.W.2d 185 (Iowa 2008) (court should not give instruction unsupported by evidence)
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) (two-part ineffective-assistance test: deficiency and prejudice)
- State v. Harris, 891 N.W.2d 182 (Iowa 2017) (prejudice standard quotation applying Strickland)
- State v. Reynolds, 746 N.W.2d 837 (Iowa 2008) (discussion of reasonable-probability prejudice)
- State v. Virgil, 895 N.W.2d 873 (Iowa 2017) (preservation of ineffective-assistance claims for PCR proceedings)
- State v. Thorndike, 860 N.W.2d 316 (Iowa 2015) (no Strickland prejudice where prosecutor removed an alternative from jury consideration)
