State of Iowa v. Daniel Logan Walden
2015 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 91
Iowa2015Background
- In 2006–2007, K.R., then about six, alleges Daniel Walden locked her in his bedroom and sexually molested her; she disclosed the abuse in 2014 at age 14.
- Walden was arrested May 9, 2014 and charged (trial information) with first‑degree kidnapping (intent to commit sexual abuse), two counts of sexual abuse (second degree), and indecent contact with a child.
- Walden moved to dismiss the first‑degree kidnapping count as time‑barred under the general three‑year felony statute of limitations (Iowa Code § 802.3 (2007)); the State argued the ten‑year extension for sexual abuse of minors (Iowa Code § 802.2(1) (2007)) applied.
- The district court denied the motion, concluding the ten‑year limitations period governed; Walden sought discretionary review.
- The Iowa Supreme Court reviewed statutory interpretation de novo, focusing on the plain text of §§ 802.2 and 802.3 and principles favoring repose in criminal limitations statutes.
- The court reversed: because kidnapping is not among the exceptions enumerated in § 802.3 and § 802.2(1) applies only to prosecutions "for sexual abuse," the first‑degree kidnapping count was time‑barred; remaining sexual‑abuse and indecent‑contact counts could proceed.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | Walden's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which statute of limitations applies to first‑degree kidnapping with intent to commit sexual abuse of a minor? | § 802.2(1) (10‑year post‑minority) applies because sexual abuse is a lesser included offense and the extended period should cover the greater charge tied to that abuse. | § 802.3 (general 3‑year felony period) controls because kidnapping is not listed among the enumerated exceptions; omission is dispositive. | § 802.3 governs; kidnapping is time‑barred. The court reversed dismissal denial and ordered the kidnapping count dismissed. |
Key Cases Cited
- Toussie v. United States, 397 U.S. 112 (explaining purposes of criminal statutes of limitations favor repose)
- State v. Robinson, 859 N.W.2d 464 (Iowa 2015) (kidnapping requires confinement/removal beyond that incidental to sexual abuse)
- State v. Rich, 305 N.W.2d 739 (Iowa 1981) (legislature intended kidnapping to require more than incidental confinement in sexual‑assault cases)
- State v. Whitfield, 315 N.W.2d 753 (Iowa 1982) (sexual abuse may be a lesser included offense of kidnapping)
- Sherwin‑Williams Co. v. Iowa Dep’t of Revenue, 789 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa 2010) (absurd‑results doctrine should be used sparingly)
- Stogner v. California, 539 U.S. 607 (limitations and ex post facto principles)
- State v. Francois, 577 N.W.2d 417 (Iowa 1998) (criminal limitations statutes to be liberally construed in favor of repose)
