State of Iowa v. Corey Larvick
20-1273
| Iowa Ct. App. | Mar 2, 2022Background:
- 2012: Larvick pleaded guilty to incest with his older daughter (about 15–17) and was sentenced to 5 years' imprisonment and a 10-year sex-offender special sentence.
- Released in 2015; special sentence discharged in 2019; classified as a Tier II offender requiring 10 years of registration from release.
- In 2020 the DOC assessed Larvick as low risk to reoffend; he had completed required sex-offender treatment.
- Larvick applied under Iowa Code § 692A.128 to be relieved of registration; the parties and district court agreed statutory threshold requirements were met.
- The district court denied modification, citing a pattern of manipulative/controlling behavior, Larvick’s renewed relationship with his ex-wife, and a concrete safety concern for his 13‑year‑old daughter.
- Larvick appealed; the appellate court held a direct appeal was the wrong procedural vehicle, converted the filing to a certiorari petition, granted the writ, and reviewed the merits.
Issues:
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proper procedure to seek review of denial | State: Denial of a modification application is not a final criminal judgment; direct appeal improper | Larvick: Proceeded by direct appeal (did not preserve procedural objection below) | Court: Direct appeal lacked jurisdiction; converted to certiorari and proceeded on the merits |
| Whether denial was an abuse of discretion given a low-risk assessment | State: District court properly relied on pattern of conduct and present risk to younger daughter and public safety | Larvick: Low-risk classification should control; denial despite low-risk was abuse of discretion | Court: No abuse; court permissibly considered relevant present-danger factors beyond the risk score |
| Whether district court impermissibly punished past conduct rather than focusing on public safety | State: Decision targeted present public-safety risk, not punishment | Larvick: Denial relied on past acts and therefore punitive | Court: Decision focused on present danger (pattern and access to victim) and public safety, not punishment |
Key Cases Cited
- Becher v. State, 957 N.W.2d 710 (Iowa 2021) (explains threshold review and that modification relief is discretionary)
- Fortune v. State, 957 N.W.2d 697 (Iowa 2021) (sets statutory threshold elements and directs courts to focus on present public-safety risk)
- State v. Iowa Dist. Ct., 843 N.W.2d 76 (Iowa 2014) (describes chapter 692A’s purpose as protecting public safety)
- State v. Propps, 897 N.W.2d 91 (Iowa 2017) (discusses appellate jurisdiction and converting improper appeals to proper review)
- Van Sloun v. Agan Bros., Inc., 778 N.W.2d 174 (Iowa 2010) (holds subject-matter jurisdiction may be raised at any time)
