State of Iowa v. Charles P. Tatum
17-0394
| Iowa Ct. App. | Oct 11, 2017Background
- In September 2016 officers stopped a vehicle and smelled burnt marijuana; a grinder and a marijuana cigarette were found within Tatum’s reach while he was a passenger.
- Officers told Tatum he would be arrested for the marijuana cigarette; Tatum fled on foot, was chased, and, while officers grabbed his clothing, swung and struck Officer Matthew Lovelady in the forehead with a closed fist.
- After arrest, 3.7 grams of crack cocaine were found in Tatum’s sock; separate marijuana-related charges also stemmed from the earlier stop. Multiple informations were filed against Tatum.
- Tatum moved to suppress the vehicle search; the district court denied the motion on passenger-standing grounds after Tatum stipulated he was a passenger.
- Tatum entered a plea agreement pleading guilty to possession of crack cocaine, assault on a peace officer, possession with intent to deliver marijuana, and carrying weapons; other charges were dismissed.
- Post-plea, Tatum sought to withdraw pleas pro se but withdrew motions before sentencing; the court sentenced him to incarceration not to exceed ten years, and Tatum appealed.
Issues
| Issue | State's Argument | Tatum's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denial of motion to suppress (search of vehicle) | Tatum lacked standing as a passenger; alternatively officers had probable cause from smell of burnt marijuana | Warrantless search was illegal because driver refused consent; suppression would have prevented subsequent charges | Plea waived direct appeal; no viable ineffective-assistance claim showing counsel failed to file motion — claim not considered further |
| Factual basis for assault-on-peace-officer plea | Record (colloquy and facts) supplies factual basis: Tatum admitted swinging at officer while fleeing | No factual basis because no proof of intent to cause pain/injury or place officer in fear | Preserved under ineffective-assistance exception; record (Tatum’s admission he swung) supplies factual basis; plea valid |
| Ineffective assistance for not objecting to assault plea | Counsel’s decisions were proper given factual basis; no deficient performance shown | Counsel ineffective for allowing withdrawal of motion in arrest of judgment and failing to preserve plea challenge | Court finds counsel not ineffective because factual basis existed and prejudice is not shown |
| Sentence and denial of deferred judgment | Sentence within statutory limits; court considered criminal history, assault while on bond, and PSI; sentencing discretionary | Requested deferred judgment and lesser sentence; argues court abused discretion | No abuse of discretion; ten-year cap sentence not unreasonable; affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Door, 184 N.W.2d 673 (Iowa 1971) (guilty plea waives most nonjurisdictional defects)
- State v. Carroll, 767 N.W.2d 638 (Iowa 2009) (ineffective-assistance claims based on failure to file a meritorious suppression motion can survive a guilty plea)
- State v. Keene, 630 N.W.2d 579 (Iowa 2001) (lack of factual basis in plea proceedings establishes ineffective assistance per se)
- State v. Finney, 834 N.W.2d 46 (Iowa 2013) (plea requires factual basis but not proof beyond a reasonable doubt)
- State v. Schminkey, 597 N.W.2d 785 (Iowa 1999) (intent often inferred from surrounding facts and circumstances for assault)
- State v. Halliburton, 539 N.W.2d 339 (Iowa 1995) (passenger standing to challenge vehicle search)
- State v. Lloyd, 530 N.W.2d 708 (Iowa 1995) (sentences within statutory limits have strong presumption of reasonableness)
- State v. Formaro, 638 N.W.2d 720 (Iowa 2002) (appellate review of sentencing is for abuse of discretion)
- State v. Hopkins, 860 N.W.2d 550 (Iowa 2015) (appellate court reviews whether sentence imposed is unreasonable)
