State of Iowa v. Bryce Lamont Meeks
16-1611
Iowa Ct. App.Jul 19, 2017Background
- Defendant Bryce Meeks was charged with driving while barred as a habitual offender (aggravated misdemeanor) and submitted a written guilty plea.
- Less than an hour after the first plea form, Meeks submitted a second nearly identical plea form that checked: “I waive my right to have a verbatim record of these proceedings.”
- The plea hearing and the subsequent sentencing hearing were not reported. A presentence investigation report (PSI) was reviewed at sentencing, Meeks spoke in mitigation, and the court sentenced him to up to two years’ incarceration and a suspended fine.
- On appeal Meeks argued the district court erred by either failing to provide a verbatim record at sentencing or failing to state on the record that he waived such a record, creating a procedural defect requiring resentencing.
- The court examined the plea form (which covered plea and sentencing rights, allocution, and PSI) and concluded Meeks expressly waived the verbatim-record requirement for both proceedings; the court’s acceptance of the plea amounted to acceptance of the waiver.
- The Court of Appeals found no procedural error or abuse of discretion and affirmed the sentence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court erred by not providing a verbatim record at sentencing or by failing to state Meeks waived such a record | Meeks’s written plea expressly waived a verbatim record of “these proceedings,” which the court accepted; waiver covers both plea and sentencing, so no error | The waiver was unclear as to whether it applied to sentencing; the court failed to state on the record that Meeks waived the verbatim record at sentencing | Waiver was valid and unambiguous; plea form’s reference to “these proceedings” encompassed plea and sentencing; acceptance of plea constituted acceptance of waiver; sentence affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- State v. Craig, 562 N.W.2d 633 (Iowa 1997) (standard for abuse of discretion in sentencing review)
- State v. Millsap, 547 N.W.2d 8 (Iowa Ct. App. 1996) (discussing appellate review standards and sentencing procedure)
