State of Iowa v. Bounmy Bounmy
15-2225
| Iowa Ct. App. | Feb 8, 2017Background
- Early morning stop of a tan Honda Accord after Deputy Struve observed it travel 4 mph over the posted limit; vehicle had been reported by another county as coming from a "known drug house."
- Driver (limited English) and two passengers (front-seat male, back-seat female Bounmy) were in the car; deputy issued a speed warning and ran license/registration/warrants.
- Deputy questioned driver and passengers about their itinerary; inconsistencies and nervousness observed; deputy then asked driver to "stick around" for additional questions and to allow a K-9 walk-around.
- Deputy escorted Bounmy toward a patrol car; while being escorted she allegedly dropped a baggie of methamphetamine, later admitted as hers; further meth found on her person at the jail.
- District court denied suppression, finding the stop valid, consent voluntary, and drugs discovered in plain view; Court of Appeals reviewed de novo and applied Rodriguez and In re Pardee.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (State) | Defendant's Argument (Bounmy) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Probable cause for initial stop | Speeding (4 mph over) provided probable cause to stop | Stop was a single deceleration event and insufficient | Held for State: observed speeding gave probable cause to stop |
| 2. Pretextual stop | Objectively valid traffic basis controls; pretext allowed under federal test | Stop was pretextual because deputies followed for drug suspicion | Held for State: bound by precedent that applies objective Whren test |
| 3. Prolongation of the stop / dog sniff | Deputies had reasonable suspicion from drug-house tip, inconsistent stories, nervousness | Questioning unrelated to traffic mission impermissibly prolonged stop; no reasonable suspicion to continue | Held for Bounmy: deputy unlawfully prolonged stop; no reasonable suspicion to detain further for dog sniff |
| 4. Validity of driver’s consent to further questioning/escort | Driver consented to additional questioning; consent justified continued detention | Consent was not voluntary (language/cultural barriers) and was tainted by prior illegal detention | Held for Bounmy: any consent was tainted by the prior unlawful prolongation and cannot justify detention |
Key Cases Cited
- In re Pardee, 872 N.W.2d 384 (Iowa 2015) (roadside dog sniff impermissible where stop was prolonged and reasonable suspicion arose only after unlawful extension)
- Rodriguez v. United States, 135 S. Ct. 1609 (2015) (traffic-stop mission defines permissible duration; dog sniff unrelated to mission cannot extend detention absent independent reasonable suspicion)
- Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218 (1973) (consent to search must be voluntary under totality of circumstances)
- Whren v. United States, 517 U.S. 806 (1996) (objective test allows pretextual traffic stops under Fourth Amendment)
- State v. Kreps, 650 N.W.2d 636 (Iowa 2002) (Iowa follows objective approach in assessing traffic-stop validity)
- State v. Tague, 676 N.W.2d 197 (Iowa 2004) (single brief lane departure may not suffice for a traffic stop under specific statute)
- State v. Lane, 726 N.W.2d 371 (Iowa 2007) (consent admissible only if voluntary and not exploitation of prior illegality)
