midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
687 S.W.3d 819
Ark.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • Raymond Bailey, Jr., on probation, signed a search waiver allowing law enforcement to search his "person, place of residence, motor vehicles, and/or any other area or property under [his] control" without a warrant.
  • Bailey was observed by police engaging in suspected drug activity at a motel, was listed as a guest for room 106, and possessed the room key.
  • Police conducted a warrantless search of the motel room under the search waiver and found heroin and drug paraphernalia.
  • Bailey moved to suppress the evidence, arguing police lacked probable cause that the motel room was his residence.
  • The trial court granted the suppression motion, holding that probable cause was required to treat the motel room as Bailey’s residence under the waiver.
  • The State appealed, arguing for a lower standard than probable cause before searching under the waiver.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standard for belief that a location is a probationer's residence under a waiver Bailey: Probable cause is required. State: Only reasonable suspicion is necessary. Law enforcement needs only reasonable suspicion, not probable cause, to believe a place is a probationer’s residence before searching under such a waiver.
Appropriateness of state interlocutory appeal Bailey: No uniform law issue for review State: Uniform application of Fourth Amendment law at stake This is a proper state interlocutory appeal as it involves the correct and uniform administration of law.
Relevance of federal precedent (e.g., Thabit’s probable cause standard) Bailey: Thabit should guide Arkansas law State: Thabit is not binding and is not persuasive for this context Arkansas declines to follow Thabit; standard is lower than probable cause for residence-search waivers.
Application of statute and reasonableness under Fourth Amendment Bailey: Statute demands specific proof of residence State: Statute only requires search is conducted reasonably Court interprets statute to require reasonable suspicion of residence and reasonable manner of search.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Guthrie, 341 Ark. 624 (Ark. 2000) (State interlocutory appeal standards in criminal cases)
  • State v. Thompson, 2010 Ark. 294 (Ark. 2010) (Search standards and totality of circumstances review)
  • State v. Robinson, 2013 Ark. 425 (Ark. 2013) (Reasonableness as the touchstone for Fourth Amendment search analysis)
  • Lane v. State, 2017 Ark. 34 (Ark. 2017) (Waivers as valid basis for warrantless searches under probation or parole)
  • Kelley v. State, 371 Ark. 599 (Ark. 2007) (Heightened privacy protections for homes under the Fourth Amendment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State of Arkansas v. Raymond N. Bailey, Jr.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: May 16, 2024
Citations: 687 S.W.3d 819; 2024 Ark. 87
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
Log In
    State of Arkansas v. Raymond N. Bailey, Jr., 687 S.W.3d 819