State of Arizona v. Miguel Francisco Inzunza, 234 Ariz. 78

Victim, a 26-year-old with significant intellectual disability, was left unsupervised; she was found with Inzunza asleep next to her in his apartment after police entered following a missing-person report.
DNA evidence showed Inzunza’s DNA on the victim’s breast and the victim’s DNA on Inzunza’s penis, supporting sexual contact.
Jury convicted Inzunza of two counts of sexual abuse; the sexual assault count was hung as a mistrial, with sexual abuse as a lesser-included offense charged.
Inzunza was sentenced to consecutive prison terms enhanced by a Washington out-of-state felony conviction; a separate criminal restitution order was imposed, later to be vacated.
The trial court denied suppression of the warrantless entry under the emergency-aid rationale; the court later excluded prior unrelated sexual-assault evidence under Rule 403.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Whether the warrantless entry was lawful under emergency-aid exception	State	Inzunza	No abuse of discretion; entry justified
Whether prior unrelated sexual-assault evidence was admissible	State	Inzunza	Precluded under Rule 403; not clearly helpful to show capacity to consent
Whether Washington conviction qualifies as a historical prior felony	State	Inzunza	Washington conviction valid as historical prior felony under statute
Whether the criminal restitution order was properly imposed	State	Inzunza	CRO improperly imposed; vacated; remainder affirmed

State v. Butler, 232 Ariz. 84 (2013) (standard for suppression review; appellate abuse of discretion review)
State v. Fisher, 141 Ariz. 227 (1984) (emergency aid exception to warrantless searches)
Brigham City v. Stuart, 547 U.S. 398 (2006) (Fourth Amendment; objective reasonableness in emergency entry)
State v. Moran, 232 Ariz. 528 (App. 2013) (historical-prior-conviction element-based analysis)
Crawford v. Moran, 214 Ariz. 129 (2007) (out-of-state convictions in repetitive-offender context)