History
  • No items yet
midpage
81 So. 3d 983
La. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • P.L. is charged with resisting an officer and illegal handgun possession; he moves to suppress the evidence.
  • Juvenile court denied suppression; adjudication hearing held on June 1, 2011.
  • Officers responded to reports of three juveniles in the backyard of an abandoned residence after curfew.
  • Mitchell observed a firearm-related object tossed by a fleeing individual; he identified P.L. as that individual.
  • Watson corroborated observations of three youths in the backyard; she did not see a gun on P.L.
  • Adjudication found P.L. delinquent for flight from an officer and handgun possession; suppression ruling appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did the tip create reasonable suspicion to stop? P.L. argues anonymous tip lacks reliability for stop. Howard-like in-person tip corroborated; reliability established by circumstances. Yes; tip provided reasonable suspicion to stop.
Was the stop supported by reasonable suspicion beyond the tip? No independent justification beyond tip; no curfew violation proven. Abandoned property and trespass concern plus flight support the stop. Yes; combined factors justified stop.
Was the seizure of the handgun lawful when abandoned by P.L.? Evidence obtained unlawfully from an improper stop. Abandoned weapon incidentally seized during lawful stop; no intrusion violative of rights. Lawful seizure; no Fourth Amendment violation.
Whether the petition's lack of verification constitutes error patently harmless. Unverified petition taints proceedings. Prosecution ratified the petition; lack of verification harmless due to ratification. Harmless error; adjudication affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Florida v. J.L., 529 U.S. 266 (U.S. 2000) (anonymous tip requires corroboration for reasonable suspicion)
  • State v. Howard, 787 So.2d 404 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2001) (in-person tip can provide reasonable suspicion; reliability assessed)
  • Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (U.S. 1972) (tip from known informant can justify stop with corroboration)
  • State v. Fayard, 537 So.2d 347 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1988) (informant/corroboration supports investigatory stop)
  • State v. Mims, 752 So.2d 192 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1999) (verification of clothing description alone not sufficient)
  • State v. Tucker, 626 So.2d 707 (La.1993) (unconstitutional seizure consequences and evidence suppression framework)
  • State v. Ryan, 358 So.2d 1274 (La.1978) (seizure of abandoned property; boundaries of privacy and intrusion)
  • State v. Sykes, 900 So.2d 156 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2005) (anonymous tip reliability considerations in stop analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State in Interest of PL
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 11, 2012
Citations: 81 So. 3d 983; 2012 La. App. LEXIS 17; 2011 La.App. 4 Cir. 1173; 2012 WL 90117; 2011-CA-1173
Docket Number: 2011-CA-1173
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In
    State in Interest of PL, 81 So. 3d 983