History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Whitehead v. Sandusky County Board of Commissioners
979 N.E.2d 1193
Ohio
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • HB 509 abolishes the Sandusky County Court and creates a Sandusky County Municipal Court effective Jan. 1, 2013.
  • The two current part-time county court judges were to serve as part-time judges of the new municipal court for a one-year 2013 term.
  • A 2013 election for the full 6-year term was to be held in November 2013.
  • HB 509 also amended procedures and timing for elections and the appointment of judges for the new court.
  • Appellants sought to declare HB 509 unconstitutional, block funding, and compel election timing for the county court seats in 2012.
  • The court of appeals ordered a special 2013 election for a one-year municipal-judge term, which this court reversed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Constitutionality of appointing county court judges to municipal court for 2013 Whitehead: HB 509 unconstitutional because appointing judges violates the constitution Sandusky County Board/AG: statute valid as part of reorganizing courts Unconstitutional as to appointment (inseparable from other provisions)
Severability of the unconstitutional portion Whitehead: severance cannot save unconstitutional part Appellees: severance should preserve constitutional parts Unseverable; entire portion addressing abolition/creation inseparable and void
Proper mandamus relief for election timing Whitehead: should mandamus compel November 2012 county-court election Board/Commissioners: severed provisions misapplied; cannot alter statute Writ granted for November 6, 2012 county-court election; special 2013 election improper
Prohibition and attorney-fee claims Whitehead: prohibition warranted to block funding of municipal court Respondents: lack of jurisdiction to prohibit funding Prohibition denied; attorney-fee claims denied

Key Cases Cited

  • Geiger v. Geiger, 117 Ohio St. 451 (1927) (Geiger severance framework; three-part test)
  • State v. Foster, 109 Ohio St.3d 1 (2006) (three-part severance standard for preserving constitutional parts)
  • Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections v. State ex rel. Schneider, 128 Ohio St.3d 273 (2010) (inseparability governs severance; whole must fall if inseparable)
  • State ex rel. Steffen v. Court of Appeals, First Appellate Dist., 126 Ohio St.3d 405 (2010) (forbids adding nonexistent provisions to statute in mandamus context)
  • Schneider (State ex rel. Schneider), 128 Ohio St.3d 273 (2010) (inseparability and severance precedent applied to HB 509)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Whitehead v. Sandusky County Board of Commissioners
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 18, 2012
Citation: 979 N.E.2d 1193
Docket Number: 2012-1666
Court Abbreviation: Ohio