History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Washington v. Krichbaum
2018 Ohio 626
Ohio Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Relator Wayman E. Washington, pro se and incarcerated, sought a writ of mandamus asking the appellate court to order Mahoning County Common Pleas Judge R. Scott Krichbaum to vacate a 2007 foreclosure decree for lack of personal jurisdiction.
  • Deutsche Bank National Trust Company obtained a foreclosure decree in 2007; the property was later sold at sheriff’s sale after intervening bankruptcy proceedings and proceeds were distributed.
  • Washington did not timely appeal the foreclosure or sale-related orders following the original proceedings.
  • Years later (about nine years), Washington moved to vacate the foreclosure decree; a magistrate denied that motion and Washington did not file objections to the magistrate’s decision.
  • Washington then filed the present original mandamus petition in the court of appeals; the county prosecutor filed a combined answer and motion to dismiss.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether mandamus is available to vacate the foreclosure decree for lack of personal jurisdiction Washington argues the foreclosure decree lacked personal jurisdiction and must be vacated Respondent argues mandamus is inappropriate because Washington had an adequate remedy by direct appeal and failed to pursue it Court held mandamus unavailable because relator has an adequate remedy at law by direct appeal and therefore dismissed the petition

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Brown v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Elections, 31 N.E.3d 596 (Ohio 2014) (mandamus is an extraordinary remedy and should be issued only when the right is clear)
  • State ex rel. Taxpayers for Westerville Schools v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Elections, 976 N.E.2d 890 (Ohio 2012) (elements required to obtain writ of mandamus)
  • State ex rel. Middletown Bd. of Edn. v. Butler Cty. Budget Comm., 510 N.E.2d 383 (Ohio 1987) (mandamus to court of appeals will not lie when relator has a plain and adequate remedy by appeal)
  • State ex rel. Willis v. Sheboy, 451 N.E.2d 1200 (Ohio 1983) (delay or inconvenience of appeal does not make appeal an inadequate remedy)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Washington v. Krichbaum
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 12, 2018
Citation: 2018 Ohio 626
Docket Number: 16 MA 0176
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.