State ex rel. Steele v. Foley (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 2073
| Ohio | 2021Background
- In 2006 Steele was indicted in two separate indictments for related sexual offenses; during trial the state moved to dismiss the first indictment.
- Steele pleaded guilty to five counts of gross sexual imposition and received an aggregate 15-year prison term.
- In August 2020 Steele filed a habeas corpus petition in the Ninth District, arguing the dismissal of the first indictment barred trying duplicative counts without a new indictment.
- The court of appeals dismissed the petition for failure to attach the affidavit required by R.C. 2969.25(A) listing civil actions filed in the prior five years; Steele’s motion for reconsideration was denied.
- Steele appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court, which reviewed the dismissal de novo and found Steele’s affidavit inadequate because it omitted parties, courts, case numbers, and outcomes.
- The court rejected Steele’s undeveloped contention that constitutional issues should excuse statutory noncompliance and affirmed the dismissal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether noncompliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) requires dismissal of a habeas petition | Steele did not dispute noncompliance but proceeded with merits; implicit argument that petition should be considered | Foley: strict compliance required; failure to attach proper affidavit mandates dismissal | Court: Strict compliance with R.C. 2969.25(A) is mandatory; noncompliance is fatal and supports dismissal |
| Whether constitutional claims excuse failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25(A) | Steele argued his constitutional claims outweigh procedural default | Foley: statutory requirement cannot be excused by asserted constitutional issues absent authority | Court: Unraised and undeveloped; no basis to excuse noncompliance for constitutional claims; dismissal affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Dixon v. Bowerman, 156 Ohio St.3d 317 (2019) (affidavit listing civil actions required under R.C. 2969.25(A))
- State ex rel. Swanson v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 156 Ohio St.3d 408 (2019) (R.C. 2969.25(A) requires strict compliance)
- State ex rel. White v. Bechtel, 99 Ohio St.3d 11 (2003) (noncompliance with affidavit requirement is grounds for dismissal)
- State ex rel. Ware v. Walsh, 159 Ohio St.3d 120 (2020) (omission of required affidavit details requires dismissal)
- State ex rel. Russell v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 161 Ohio St.3d 312 (2020) (affirming dismissal for inadequate R.C. 2969.25(A) affidavit)
- State ex rel. Steele v. Eppinger, 147 Ohio St.3d 404 (2016) (listed by relator in affidavit)
- State ex rel. Steele v. McClelland, 154 Ohio St.3d 574 (2018) (listed by relator in affidavit)
