midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
24 N.W.3d 874
Neb.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • The Lower Republican Natural Resources District (LRNRD) issued a 2017 order permanently decertifying 1,107.5 irrigated acres after finding violations (meter tampering) by various landowners, including land owned by SBS Farms, Inc. and land later distributed to Steve Seeman.
  • SBS Farms owned some affected land at the time of the administrative proceedings; Seeman acquired his interest in other parcels only after distribution from an estate, post-proceeding.
  • The LRNRD did not specifically name or serve SBS Farms with notice of its proceedings, though notices were sent to Schluntz and his estate, and published generally.
  • Both Seeman and SBS filed mandamus actions years later to compel LRNRD to set aside the 2017 order, claiming lack of jurisdiction and due process.
  • The district court granted mandamus in their favor and awarded attorney fees—LRNRD appealed, and Seeman/SBS cross-appealed, leading to the current Supreme Court opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Validity of the 2017 Order for lack of notice SBS: Not named/served, so order void for due process LRNRD: Real party interest (ownership/address), so adequate notice given Order void as to SBS; due process required direct notice to corporate landowner.
Validity of the 2017 Order as to later owner Seeman: Order voided as to him, as he was not involved LRNRD: Seeman’s claim derivative; order completed pre-acquisition Order not void as to Seeman; post-order acquisition doesn’t revive decertified status.
Whether mandamus relief and attorney fees proper Both: Board has ministerial duty not to enforce void order LRNRD: Sovereign immunity bars affirmative relief; order not void as to Seeman Affirmative mandates barred by sovereign immunity; writ and fees affirmed only as to SBS.
Perpetual restraint argument Seeman: Permanent decertification unlawful restraint LRNRD: Act authorizes permanent decertification/penalties No merit; Act and rules allow for permanent decertification and potential recertification.

Key Cases Cited

  • Prokop v. Lower Loup NRD, 302 Neb. 10 (property rights in ground water entitled to due process protection)
  • Francisco v. Gonzalez, 301 Neb. 1045 (judgment without personal jurisdiction is void)
  • Estate of Schluntz v. Lower Republican NRD, 300 Neb. 582 (subject matter jurisdiction in administrative order appeals)
  • Community Care Health Plan of Neb. v. Jackson, 317 Neb. 141 (mandamus actions against public officers not precluded by sovereign immunity if not seeking affirmative state action)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Seeman v. Lower Republican NRD
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 22, 2025
Citations: 24 N.W.3d 874; 319 Neb. 681; S-24, 326, S-24-327
Docket Number: S-24, 326, S-24-327
Court Abbreviation: Neb.
Log In