State ex rel. Scott v. Streetsboro (Slip Opinion)
150 Ohio St. 3d 1
| Ohio | 2016Background
- In May 2009 Streetsboro's mayor resigned; council appointed Councilmember Arthur F. Scott as acting mayor. At a public meeting Scott stated he would serve as acting mayor for his council salary ($3,600/yr) and the council passed a resolution setting his pay at that rate; Scott signed it.
- In November 2009 Scott was elected to serve the remainder of the term and was paid the prior mayor's salary ($74,328/yr); he lost reelection in 2011.
- In September 2012 Scott petitioned for a writ of mandamus claiming (1) unpaid compensation for unused vacation, sick, and personal leave; (2) underpayment for his elected-mayor salary (including one final day); and (3) underpayment for service as acting mayor.
- The court of appeals granted summary judgment to Streetsboro on all claims except entitlement to pay for Scott's last day in office; Scott appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.
- The Supreme Court affirmed the grant of summary judgment as to mayoral and acting-mayor salary claims, reversed as to unused-leave claims, denied oral argument, and found no abuse of discretion in the court of appeals’ effective denial of Scott's motion to strike late-produced discovery.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entitlement to compensation for unused vacation, sick, and personal leave | Scott: Charter entitles mayor to "salary with benefits" and his paystubs show accrued leave; handbook does not control; he should be paid for unused leave | Streetsboro: Employee handbook controls and limits accrual/forfeiture; elected officials not entitled to sick leave per handbook | Genuine issues of material fact exist about whether charter or handbook governs and whether Scott accrued leave; reversed summary judgment and remanded for evidentiary hearing |
| Salary as elected mayor (including final day) | Scott: Charter formula would make mayoral pay higher (1% above highest dept. head); he was underpaid (claimed $80,800 vs $74,328) | Streetsboro: Scott was elected to complete an existing four-year term; charter bars changing mayoral pay after start of term; prior mayor's salary controls | Affirmed summary judgment for Streetsboro — no duty to reset salary mid-term under charter |
| Salary as acting mayor | Scott: Acting mayor should be paid mayoral rate or otherwise entitled to higher pay | Streetsboro: Charter silent on acting mayor pay; Scott publicly agreed to serve at council salary and signed resolution so he waived claim | Affirmed summary judgment for Streetsboro — waiver and no clear legal right to higher pay |
| Motion to strike late-produced discovery / request for oral argument | Scott: City produced key documents after discovery deadline; court should have struck them and excluded reliance | Streetsboro: Documents were public records discovered while drafting response; used promptly; court discretion on sanctions | No abuse of discretion in court of appeals effectively denying motion to strike; oral argument denied as discretionary and unnecessary |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Manley v. Walsh, 142 Ohio St.3d 384 (2014) (factors for granting oral argument and appellate discretion)
- Appenzeller v. Miller, 136 Ohio St.3d 378 (2013) (appellate practice regarding oral argument and issues of importance)
- Toney v. Berkemer, 6 Ohio St.3d 455 (1983) (abuse-of-discretion standard for discovery rulings)
- Ward v. Hester, 36 Ohio St.2d 38 (1974) (sanction of excluding evidence for failure to produce discovery)
- Huffman v. Hair Surgeon, Inc., 19 Ohio St.3d 83 (1985) (prejudice controls sanctions for discovery failures)
- Nakoff v. Fairview Gen. Hosp., 75 Ohio St.3d 254 (1996) (preference to decide cases on merits using reliable evidence)
- State ex rel. Waters v. Spaeth, 131 Ohio St.3d 55 (2012) (elements and burden for mandamus)
- State ex rel. Mun. Constr. Equip. Operators’ Labor Council v. Cleveland, 141 Ohio St.3d 113 (2014) (standard of review for mandamus denials)
- State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 69 Ohio St.3d 217 (1994) (assumption that an unrulled motion is overruled)
