History
  • No items yet
midpage
State ex rel. Salim v. Ayed
2013 Ohio 4880
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Relators seek a writ of quo warranto to oust Omar Mosque directors; Initial Board identified included Ayed, Bin Hammam, Kashou, Marashdeh, Dada and intended to govern only through 2009; board continued past 2009 with questions about elections; on Sept. 9, 2011, mosque members met to discuss concerns and potential steps; Oct. 8, 2011 community vote contemplated continued board vs new election; April 21, 2012 election produced a Third Board and 146 valid ballots; court held relators lack standing as private citizens and the office is not a public office for quo warranto purposes, so the action was improper.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standing to sue quo warranto as private citizens Salim argues they are entitled to bring as private citizens. Ayed contends private citizens lack standing for nonprofit director quo warranto. Relators lack standing; action dismissed.
Whether nonprofit mosque directors constitute a public office Relators argue directors hold public office. Respondents contend nonprofit directors are not public offices. Not a public office; private citizens cannot bring quo warranto.
Proper scope of magistrate conclusions on standing and findings Salim challenges certain factual findings. Ayed defends magistrate's factual scope. Court adopts magistrate’s legal conclusions; certain findings corrected, others sustained.
Authority to bring quo warranto when AG or prosecutor can act Relators rely on private action until AG/prosecutor acts. AG/prosecutor can initiate; private action not required. Relators not deprived of remedy; AG or prosecutor should pursue.

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Hawthorne v. Russell, 107 Ohio St.3d 269 (2005-Ohio-6431) (private citizen may sue only when claiming title to a public office)
  • State ex rel. E. Cleveland Fire Fighters' Assn., Local 500, Internatl. Assn. of Fire Fighters, 96 Ohio St.3d 68 (2002-Ohio-3527) (private citizen standing to sue for quo warranto)
  • State ex rel. Cain v. Kay, 38 Ohio St.2d 15 (1974) (quo warranto right generally with state/officers; not private individuals)
  • State ex rel. Annable v. Stokes, 24 Ohio St.2d 32 (1970) (private right to quo warranto limited to public office)
  • Hawthorn v. Russell (State ex rel.), 107 Ohio St.3d 269 (2005-Ohio-6431) (standing and public office analysis for quo warranto)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Salim v. Ayed
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 5, 2013
Citation: 2013 Ohio 4880
Docket Number: 12AP-356
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.