History
  • No items yet
midpage
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FOARD
2017 OK 92
| Okla. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • The Oklahoma Bar Association (OBA) filed an application asking the Oklahoma Supreme Court to approve Jean Lea Foard’s resignation from the OBA pending disciplinary proceedings under Rule 8.1.
  • Grievance DC 17-74 alleged Foard misappropriated or converted settlement funds she received on behalf of two minor children (personal injury settlements).
  • Foard executed a voluntary, uncoerced resignation on August 26, 2017, and submitted an affidavit supporting the resignation.
  • Foard waived the right to contest the misconduct allegation, thereby relieving the OBA of proving the allegation in disciplinary proceedings.
  • Foard acknowledged alleged conduct, agreed to reimburse any Client Security Fund payments of principal plus statutory interest before applying for reinstatement, and agreed to comply with Rule 9.1.
  • The Court approved the resignation effective August 26, 2017, struck Foard’s name from the Roll of Attorneys, imposed a five‑year minimum bar on seeking reinstatement, and ordered reimbursement of OBA costs ($238.39) within 180 days.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the Court should accept a resignation pending disciplinary proceedings under Rule 8.1 OBA: Resignation complies with Rule 8.1 and should be approved given the pending grievance and affidavit Foard: Tendered a voluntary, informed resignation and waived contest of the allegations Court accepted and approved the resignation effective 8/26/2017
Whether Foard’s waiver of contest and admission of facts suffices in lieu of proving misconduct OBA: Waiver relieves OBA of proving the alleged misconduct Foard: Waived right to contest the allegation Court treated waiver as relieving OBA of proof; resignation approved accordingly
Whether Foard must reimburse Client Security Fund if claims paid OBA: Foard should reimburse principal and statutory interest before any reinstatement application Foard: Agreed to reimburse such payments prior to reinstatement application Court required reimbursement conditionally as part of resignation terms
Proper reinstatement restrictions and compliance obligations OBA: Five‑year minimum bar and Rule 9.1 compliance appropriate Foard: Agreed to five‑year minimum and to comply with Rule 9.1 and Rule 11 procedures for reinstatement Court ordered five‑year bar on applying for reinstatement and mandated Rule 9.1 compliance

Key Cases Cited

  • No published case authorities with official reporter citations are cited in the opinion.
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FOARD
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Nov 20, 2017
Citation: 2017 OK 92
Court Abbreviation: Okla.