History
  • No items yet
midpage
2019 Ohio 4065
Ohio Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Petitioner Jerry Miller filed a habeas corpus petition (June 19, 2019) asserting his sentence had expired and that his continued confinement was unlawful.
  • The Ohio Attorney General, for Warden Harold May, moved to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) (alternatively sought summary judgment).
  • Miller attached several state sentencing entries but did not attach documentation for a referenced federal sentence or any parole-revocation records.
  • The court held Miller’s petition failed to satisfy R.C. 2725.04(D)’s requirement to file all pertinent commitment papers.
  • Relying on Ohio precedent, the court found the absence of those records is fatal to a habeas petition because the court cannot determine how much time remained on the sentence.
  • The court granted the State’s motion to dismiss under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) and dismissed Miller’s petition.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Compliance with R.C. 2725.04(D) — attachment of commitment papers Miller: his sentence expired; he referenced a federal sentence and termination entry State: petitioner failed to attach all pertinent commitment papers (federal sentence docs and parole-revocation records) Dismissed — failure to attach required commitment papers is fatal; court cannot determine remaining sentence time
Dismissal under Civ.R. 12(B)(6) (facial sufficiency) Miller: entitled to habeas relief based on alleged expired sentence State: petition is facially deficient; even assuming allegations true, no set of facts entitles relief without records Granted — petition fails as a matter of law and is dismissed

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Boggs v. Springfield Loc. School Dist. Bd. of Edn., 72 Ohio St.3d 94 (1995) (Civ.R. 12(B)(6) tests complaint sufficiency)
  • Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470 (2008) (complaint should be dismissed only when no set of facts would entitle relief)
  • Bloss v. Rogers, 65 Ohio St.3d 145 (1992) (commitment papers are necessary for a habeas petition; omission is fatally defective)
  • State ex rel. Cannon v. Mohr, 155 Ohio St.3d 213 (2018) (petitioner must submit complete records of incarceration and releases)
  • State ex rel. Crigger v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 82 Ohio St.3d 270 (1998) (failure to attach parole-revocation records can be fatal to a habeas petition)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Miller v. May, Warden
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 2, 2019
Citations: 2019 Ohio 4065; 19 CA 56
Docket Number: 19 CA 56
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In