State ex rel. McKee v. Union Metal Corp. (Slip Opinion)
150 Ohio St. 3d 223
| Ohio | 2017Background
- In 1993 Stephen McKee, an auto welder for Union Metal Corp., sustained allowed work injuries (cervical sprain/strain, focal spinal stenosis, and neurotic depression).
- McKee sought temporary-total disability benefits twice; both denials rested on a commission finding that he voluntarily abandoned his employment in late 1995.
- In 2000 McKee applied for permanent-total-disability (PTD) benefits; a staff hearing officer denied PTD based on two medical reports and a vocational assessment showing capacity for entry-level work; McKee did not appeal that order.
- In 2014 McKee filed a second PTD application; the commission noted no evidence he worked, sought work, or pursued retraining after 1998 and that he was receiving Social Security disability benefits.
- The staff hearing officer concluded McKee voluntarily abandoned the workforce for reasons unrelated to his allowed conditions and denied PTD; the Tenth District denied mandamus relief, and the Supreme Court of Ohio affirmed.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Industrial Commission abused its discretion by denying permanent-total-disability benefits on the ground McKee voluntarily abandoned the workforce | McKee: his retirement was not voluntary but was induced by his allowed injuries and by physician/psychologist advice; thus he remains eligible for PTD | Commission/State: prior 2000 finding and medical/vocational evidence, lack of evidence of work or job search after 1998, and receipt of Social Security disability show voluntary abandonment unrelated to allowed conditions | Held: Affirmed — some evidence supports the commission’s finding of voluntary abandonment, so no abuse of discretion; mandamus denied |
Key Cases Cited
- State ex rel. Black v. Indus. Comm., 137 Ohio St.3d 75 (2013) (commission may deny PTD if claimant voluntarily retired for reasons unrelated to allowed conditions)
- State ex rel. Pierron v. Indus. Comm., 120 Ohio St.3d 40 (2008) (claimant's post-employment inaction can support finding of voluntary workforce abandonment)
- State ex rel. Kroger Co. v. Paysen, 109 Ohio St.3d 515 (2006) (claimant not disqualified for refusing work inconsistent with physician advice)
- State ex rel. Roxbury v. Indus. Comm., 138 Ohio St.3d 91 (2014) (inaction after leaving work can indicate voluntary retirement)
- State ex rel. Nissan Brake Ohio, Inc. v. Indus. Comm., 127 Ohio St.3d 385 (2010) (definition and burden for permanent total disability)
