History
  • No items yet
midpage
2013 Ohio 4218
Ohio Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Relator, an inmate, petitions for a writ of mandamus to stop and recover funds deducted from his inmate account.
  • Relator’s complaint was referred to a magistrate who recommended dismissal for failure to comply with R.C. 2969.25.
  • R.C. 2969.25 requires an affidavit listing every civil action or appeal filed in the prior five years, with detailed information.
  • Relator filed objections arguing for merit-based decision and requesting permission to amend to provide required information.
  • The court independently reviewed and found relator failed to file the required affidavit at commencement, satisfying dismissal grounds.
  • Relator also sought leave to proceed under R.C. 2323.52; the court found he is not subject to a vexatious-litigant order and denied leave.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Must the action be dismissed for failure to file the RC 2969.25(A) affidavit? Harsh argues he attempted to list actions and should be allowed to amend. Mohr contends noncompliance is mandatory and warrants dismissal. Yes; mandatory dismissal for noncompliance.
Was the vexatious-litigant application properly denied? Harsh contends he is not vexatious and should be allowed to proceed. Mohr asserts Harsh is not subject to an order, but the application is denied based on independent review. Application denied; not subject to leave to proceed.

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Evans v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2011-Ohio-2871 (10th Dist. No. 10AP-730, 2011-Ohio-2871) (mandatory affidavit compliance under RC 2969.25)
  • State ex rel. Washington v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 87 Ohio St.3d 258 (Ohio Supreme Court 1999) (strict application of RC 2969.25; no leeway for noncompliance)
  • Fuqua v. Williams, 100 Ohio St.3d 211 (Ohio Supreme Court 2003) (belated filing does not excuse noncompliance)
  • Hall v. Collins, 2010-Ohio-3845 (10th Dist.) (documents under RC 2969.25 must be filed at filing)
  • State ex rel. Martin v. Ghee, 2002-Ohio- (10th Dist.) (describes sufficiency standards for prior actions under RC 2969.25)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Harsh v. Mohr
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Sep 26, 2013
Citations: 2013 Ohio 4218; 13AP-403
Docket Number: 13AP-403
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In