History
  • No items yet
midpage
2023 Ohio 4569
Ohio
2023
Read the full case

Background

  • Bradford S. Davic was indicted in 2010 for multiple sex offenses involving a minor under 13 in Franklin County, Ohio.
  • Davic pled guilty to several charges in exchange for the dismissal of others and certain specifications; the plea form indicated a possible sentence of 53 years to life.
  • At sentencing, Davic received a 40 years to life term and was classified as a Tier III sex offender with mandatory postrelease control.
  • Davic's convictions were affirmed on direct appeal, and he subsequently pursued multiple unsuccessful post-conviction motions and appeals to challenge his plea and sentence.
  • In 2022, Davic filed a complaint for a writ of prohibition in the court of appeals, asserting the trial court lacked jurisdiction due to an unenforceable plea agreement.
  • The court of appeals dismissed his complaint, finding he had adequate legal remedies and that the trial court had subject-matter jurisdiction over his case.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether prohibition lies to challenge sentencing jurisdiction No meeting of the minds on plea; court lacked jurisdiction Had remedies by appeal; court had jurisdiction No prohibition; court had jurisdiction
Adequacy of remedies at law No adequate remedy for void sentencing Appellate remedies and postconviction review were available Adequate remedies existed; no writ available
Motion for oral argument Sought oral argument Opposed; not law or fact complex Denied
Request to declare plaintiff vexatious litigator — Argued repetitive, frivolous filings Denied; no frivolous conduct in this court

Key Cases Cited

  • Pratts v. Hurley, 102 Ohio St.3d 81 (Distinction between subject-matter jurisdiction and errors in its exercise; void vs. voidable judgments)
  • State v. Harper, 160 Ohio St.3d 480 (Errors in jurisdiction exercise render judgments voidable, not void)
  • State ex rel. Pizza v. Rayford, 62 Ohio St.3d 382 (A court with proper jurisdiction acts within its authority even if it errs)
  • State ex rel. Boler v. McCarthy, 170 Ohio St.3d 392 (Common pleas courts have subject-matter jurisdiction over felonies)
  • Dunbar v. State, 136 Ohio St.3d 181 (Conviction based on an invalid plea is jurisdictional error, not lack of jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: State ex rel. Davic v. Franklin Cty. Court of Common Pleas
Court Name: Ohio Supreme Court
Date Published: Dec 19, 2023
Citations: 2023 Ohio 4569; 173 Ohio St.3d 328; 229 N.E.3d 1182; 223 N.E.3d 498; 172 Ohio St.3d 1429; 2023-Ohio-4595; 2023-0588
Docket Number: 2023-0588
Court Abbreviation: Ohio
Log In