Starke County Assessor v. Porter-Starke Services, Inc.
71T10-1701-TA-2
Ind. T.C.Dec 8, 2017Background
- Porter-Starke Services, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit and certified Community Mental Health Center (CMHC) that owned an 8,239 sq. ft. medical building on 1.147 acres in Starke County; 1,591 sq. ft. was leased to a third party in 2015.
- Porter-Starke provided outpatient and related mental-health/addiction services to patients of all ages, operated under unpaid board oversight, employed licensed clinicians, accepted fees on a sliding scale, and did not deny care for inability to pay.
- It received county, state, and federal funding and was subject to state oversight and audits as a CMHC, but its CFO testified it would continue services without public funding.
- Porter-Starke applied for a 100% charitable purposes property-tax exemption for 2015; the PTABOA denied it and the Indiana Board of Tax Review granted an 81% exemption (excluding the leased portion) after a hearing.
- The Starke County Assessor appealed the Indiana Board’s decision to the Indiana Tax Court, arguing (1) the Board erroneously treated CMHC status as a per se exemption and (2) the Board’s finding of sufficient public benefit was unsupported by substantial evidence.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether CMHC status or 501(c)(3) status creates a per se charitable exemption | Assessor: CMHC/501(c)(3) status should not relieve taxpayer of proving charitable financial operations; Grandview implies near-per-se treatment for certain nonprofit care providers | Porter-Starke/Board: No per se rule claimed; exemption must be decided on the facts and evidence of charitable use and public benefit | Court: No per se exemption; Board did not treat CMHC status as per se and applied fact-specific analysis; affirmed |
| Whether substantial and reliable evidence supports finding of public benefit sufficient to justify tax revenue loss | Assessor: Evidence is speculative; receipt of public funding undermines claim that Porter-Starke relieves governmental burden | Porter-Starke/Board: Evidence shows Porter-Starke relieves governmental burden (access deficit in county, sliding-scale fees, indigent care, cooperation with law enforcement); receipt of grants does not preclude exemption if taxpayer shows relief beyond grants | Court: Record contains more than a scintilla of evidence that Porter-Starke lessened government burden and provided public benefit; Board’s finding supported and affirmed |
Key Cases Cited
- Marineland Gardens Cmty. Ass’n v. Kosciusko Cnty. Assessor, 26 N.E.3d 1087 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (deference to Indiana Board when acting within authority)
- Hamilton Cnty. Prop. Tax Assessment Bd. of Appeals v. Oaken Bucket Partners, LLC, 938 N.E.2d 654 (Ind.) (general taxability principle)
- Jamestown Homes of Mishawaka, Inc. v. St. Joseph Cnty. Assessor, 914 N.E.2d 13 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (charitable exemption is fact-specific; no bright-line tests)
- Trinity Episcopal Church v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 694 N.E.2d 816 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (ownership, occupancy, and use required for exemption)
- Indianapolis Elks Bldg. Corp. v. State Bd. of Tax Comm’rs, 251 N.E.2d 673 (Ind. Ct. App.) (broad constitutional understanding of charitable purpose)
- Tipton Cnty. Health Care Found., Inc. v. Tipton Cnty. Assessor, 961 N.E.2d 1048 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (charitable act plus public benefit required)
- Knox Cnty. Prop. Tax Assessment Bd. of Appeals v. Grandview Care, Inc., 826 N.E.2d 177 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (context for nonprofit elder-care exemption analysis)
- Housing P’ships, Inc. v. Owens, 10 N.E.3d 1057 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (receipt of public grants does not automatically preclude exemption; taxpayer must show relief beyond grants)
- Housing P’ships, Inc. v. Owens, 17 N.E.3d 403 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (rehearing decision relevant to funding/evidence issues)
- College Corner, L.P. v. Dep’t of Local Gov’t Fin., 840 N.E.2d 905 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (private organization relieves government burden = public benefit)
- DeKalb Cnty. Assessor v. Chavez, 48 N.E.3d 928 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (substantial evidence standard defined)
- Kildsig v. Warrick Cnty. Assessor, 998 N.E.2d 764 (Ind. Tax Ct.) (court will not reweigh evidence on appeal)
