midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
39 Pa. D. & C.5th 428
Pennsylvania Court of Common P...
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Decedent died from DVT/PE in hospital; causation is contested, not the existence of death.
  • Plaintiff settled with settling defendants (hospital and Drs. Smith, McGinley, Hanley) prior to trial under UCATA pro tanto release.
  • Non-settling defendants remain in suit to preserve joint tortfeasor issues and potential apportionment.
  • Release provides for pro-rata reduction if non-settling defendants are jointly liable with settling defendants.
  • Trial yielded a verdict for all defendants as non-negligent; hospital was nonsuited.
  • Plaintiff sought post-trial relief, including discontinuing settling defendants and limiting expert cross-examination; relief denied.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Discontinuing settling defendants and verdict-slip inclusion Stang to discontinue against settling defendants UCATA requires settling defendants to remain for apportionment Denial upheld; settling defendants remain for apportionment
Prima facie case against settling doctors for verdict slip Settling doctors negligent; should be on verdict slip No prima facie case against settling doctors Prima facie case established; include on verdict slip
Scope of cross-examination of plaintiff's experts Limit cross-examination to non-settling defendants’ issues Cross-examination may address all opinions Cross-examination allowed on full expert opinions, including against settling defendants

Key Cases Cited

  • Baker v. ACandS, 755 A.2d 664 (Pa. 2000) (set-off under UCATA; pro rata vs pro tanto releases)
  • Davis v. Miller, 123 A.2d 422 (Pa. 1956) (joint tortfeasor releases preserve apportionment rights)
  • National Liberty Life Ins. Co. v. Kling Partnership, 504 A.2d 1273 (Pa. Super. 1986) (cross-claims unnecessary to retain settling defendants for apportionment)
  • Hyrcza v. West Penn Allegheny Health System, Inc., 978 A.2d 961 (Pa. Super. 2009) (right of non-settling defendant to have settling defendant on verdict slip)
  • Herbert v. Parkview Hospital, 854 A.2d 1285 (Pa. Super. 2004) (elements of medical malpractice; causation via deviation)
  • Boucher v. Pennsylvania Hospital, 831 A.2d 623 (Pa. Super. 2003) (cross-exam may include non-admitted reports to impeach expert)
  • Mattia v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 531 A.2d 789 (Pa. Super. 1987) (joint tortfeasor status and contribution framework)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Stang v. Smith
Court Name: Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County
Date Published: Jul 28, 2014
Citations: 39 Pa. D. & C.5th 428; No. 09-3311
Docket Number: No. 09-3311
Log In