History
  • No items yet
midpage
130 So. 3d 1194
Ala.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Means was admitted to Cedar Crest on Jan. 25, 2012 for rehabilitation while his daughter Pleasant signed the DRA as Legal Representative or Family Member.
  • DRA defined the scope of the 'parties' to include the resident, family, legal representatives, and the facility and its personnel.
  • Pleasant lacked a power of attorney for Means; she states no authority to sign on his behalf.
  • Means was later read as mentally incompetent at admission, with no evidence of competency at relevant times.
  • Bolding, as Means’s attorney in fact and next friend, sued SSC Montgomery for medical malpractice on March 6, 2012; arbitration motion filed April 5, 2012; trial court denied.
  • Court reviews denial of a motion to compel arbitration de novo and requires movant to show contract to arbitrate and its interstate-commerce nexus.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does the DRA bind the non-signatory via Pleasant’s signature Bolding argues Pleasant’s signature binds Means SSC Montgomery argues Pleasant acted as authority for Means No; Pleasant lacked authority to bind Means.
Is there apparent authority to bind Means to the DRA Apparent authority could bind Means and Bolding No apparent authority given Means’ incompetence Not bound; incompetence defeats apparent authority.
Was Means mentally incompetent at signing the DRA Means was incompetent at signing Evidence contested; not enough to bind Means incompetent; DRA unenforceable against him.
Does Bolding’s suit on Means’s behalf get bound by the DRA signed by Pleasant DRA binds resident’s representatives to arbitration DRA does not bind an incompetent resident or improper representative Bolding not bound; DRA ineffective due to Means’s incompetence.

Key Cases Cited

  • Noland Health Servs. v. Wright, 971 So.2d 681 (Ala. 2007) (distinguishes incompetent resident binding rules for authority of representative)
  • Johnson v. Tennessee Health Mgmt., Inc., 49 So.3d 175 (Ala. 2010) (recognizes distinction between competent residents and those incompetent when binding by representative)
  • Carraway v. Beverly Enters. Alabama, Inc., 978 So.2d 27 (Ala. 2007) (applies apparent authority where competent resident acquiesces to representative)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: SSC Montgomery Cedar Crest Operating Co. v. Bolding
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Mar 22, 2013
Citations: 130 So. 3d 1194; 2013 Ala. LEXIS 25; 2013 WL 1173975; 1120122
Docket Number: 1120122
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
Log In
    SSC Montgomery Cedar Crest Operating Co. v. Bolding, 130 So. 3d 1194