History
  • No items yet
midpage
(SS) Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
2:18-cv-01991
E.D. Cal.
Jul 21, 2021
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Shantell Campbell sought Disability Insurance Benefits (Title II) and Supplemental Security Income (Title XVI). The court previously remanded the case on March 4, 2020.
  • On remand plaintiff received $81,015 in past-due benefits.
  • Plaintiff and counsel had a contingent-fee agreement providing for up to 25% of past-due benefits. Counsel filed for § 406(b) fees requesting $20,253.75 (25% of $81,015).
  • The Commissioner did not oppose the request and submitted an analysis instead of an objection.
  • The court applied the Gisbrecht/Crawford reasonableness framework, noting counsel spent 26.4 hours, achieved a favorable result, and engaged in no dilatory or substandard conduct.
  • The court found the requested fee reasonable, awarded $20,253.75 under § 406(b), directed payment, and ordered counsel to reimburse plaintiff $5,000 previously awarded under the EAJA.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether a § 406(b) fee of $20,253.75 (25% of past-due benefits) is reasonable Fee is authorized by the contingent-fee agreement; counsel obtained successful result and assumed risk; 26.4 hours of work justify fee Commissioner did not oppose fee and supplied analysis only Fee is reasonable under Gisbrecht/Crawford; awarded $20,253.75
Whether prior EAJA award offsets the § 406(b) award Counsel accepts that EAJA must be offset; client should receive EAJA reimbursement Commissioner did not contest offset Court ordered counsel to reimburse plaintiff $5,000 EAJA upon receipt of § 406(b) fees

Key Cases Cited

  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc) (discussing §406(b) review and deference to contingent-fee agreements)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (U.S. 2002) (establishing the reasonableness standard and factors for §406(b) awards)
  • Craig v. Sec'y, Dep't of Health & Human Servs., 864 F.2d 324 (4th Cir. 1989) (recognizing the Commissioner may challenge §406(b) awards)
  • Cotter v. Bowen, 879 F.2d 359 (8th Cir. 1989) (explaining the need to balance attorney incentive against depletion of claimant benefits)
  • Hearn v. Barnhart, 262 F. Supp. 2d 1033 (N.D. Cal. 2003) (noting counsel assume risk under contingent-fee arrangements)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: (SS) Campbell v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court Name: District Court, E.D. California
Date Published: Jul 21, 2021
Docket Number: 2:18-cv-01991
Court Abbreviation: E.D. Cal.