History
  • No items yet
midpage
SourceGas Distrib. v. City of Hastings
287 Neb. 595
| Neb. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Hastings annexed property March 14, 2011; SourceGas owns gas facilities within annexed area.
  • Hastings seeks to condemn SourceGas’s gas facilities under chapter 76.
  • SourceGas sues in district court January 22, 2013 for injunction and to challenge procedures.
  • District court overruled injunctive relief and dismissed complaint Feb. 22, 2013.
  • Gas System Condemnation Act §19-4626(2) exempts Hastings from that Act when annexation places property within Hastings’ boundaries.
  • This appeal asks whether chapter 76 or the Gas System Condemnation Act governs damages and procedures.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §19-4626(2) exempts Gas System Condemnation Act. SourceGas cites §19-4626(2) to apply Gas Act. Hastings argues §19-4626(2) clearly exempts Act when annexed property. Yes; Gas System Condemnation Act does not apply.
Damages framework under §76-703 applicable here. Damages should follow GAS Act provisions. Damages governed by chapter 76 unless other statutes apply. Chapter 76 applies; other statutes in §76-703 not controlling.
Whether the sufficiency of the property description was properly addressed. Description defective; must be addressed. Premature to decide; lacks error in record. No error; description issue premature to decide.
Whether Chaffin’s affidavit was properly admitted. Chaffin’s affidavit admissible to aid analysis. Affidavit consideration unnecessary; prejudice risk. Admissibility harmless; no reversible error.
Whether district court erred by not applying Gas System Condemnation Act as to annexed gas facilities. Gas Act governs condemnation of gas facilities. Annexation creates exception; Act not applicable. District court did not err; Act not applicable.

Key Cases Cited

  • Strasburg v. Union Pacific RR. Co., 286 Neb. 743 (2013) (plain language governs; read statute according to ordinary meaning)
  • Fisher v. PayFlex Systems USA, 285 Neb. 808 (2013) (plain and unambiguous statutory language applied)
  • Simon v. Drake, 285 Neb. 784 (2013) (harmless error standard for evidentiary rulings)
  • Blakely v. Lancaster County, 284 Neb. 659 (2012) (avoid readings that render terms meaningless)
  • In re Estate of Odenreider, 286 Neb. 480 (2013) (statutory interpretation and independent review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: SourceGas Distrib. v. City of Hastings
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 7, 2014
Citation: 287 Neb. 595
Docket Number: S-13-239
Court Abbreviation: Neb.