History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sosnowy v. A. Perri Farms, Inc.
2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13702
| E.D.N.Y | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Sosnowy, a salesman at A. Perri Farms, Inc., alleges unpaid wages and overtime under FLSA, Labor Law, and state unjust enrichment and breach of contract claims.
  • Perri Farms and Anthony J. Perry contend Sosnowy was an exempt executive/administrative employee and that wage claims are superseded by the FLSA/Labor Law.
  • Plaintiff asserts overtime, spread of hours, and vacation/sick pay upon termination; also alleges improper wage deductions and inadequate breaks.
  • Defendants provide W-2s and payroll docs to support higher pay and deductions; plaintiff seeks to strike those attached documents.
  • Court analyzes whether state common law claims are preempted by FLSA/Labor Law and whether implied contract claims survive, and whether specific NYLL claims are actionable.
  • Court grants in part: dismisses overtime-based common-law claims; dismisses improper deductions, spread-of-hours, and vacation/sick-pay claims without prejudice, with leave to amend.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are state common law wage claims preempted by the FLSA? Sosnowy argues state claims provide additional or independent remedies. Perry Farms contends FLSA preempts duplicative state claims for overtime. Partially preempted; FLSA preempts overtime-based state claims to the extent they duplicate; other non-FLSA-based contract claims survive.
Can a nonstatutory (contract/unjust enrichment) claim for overtime proceed alongside FLSA claims? Contract-based overtime may exist independently of FLSA rules. Overtime remedies are exclusive to FLSA; contract claims duplicative should be dismissed. Overtime-based contract/unjust enrichment claims are dismissed without prejudice to amendment identifying a non-statutory basis.
Whether improper deductions under NYLL § 193 are cognizable when deductions are for tardiness. Deductions for tardiness may constitute improper deductions or penalties. Deductions may be treated as absence of payment rather than penalties; ambiguity requires dismissal without prejudice. Dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a clear claim; leave to amend to specify nature of deductions.
Does NYLL § 142-2.4 spread-of-hours pay apply to Sosnowy given his wage level? Yang supports applying spread-of-hours to all eligible employees regardless of total pay. Spread-of-hours applies primarily to minimum wage workers; Sosnowy earnings likely exceed minimum wage. Dismissed with prejudice? Noting court granted to amend; spread-of-hours claim dismissed without prejudice pending amendment.
Can accrued vacation/sick pay be recovered under NY Labor Law § 191(3) or § 198/§ 198-c? Plaintiff seeks vacation/sick pay upon termination under multiple provisions. Section 191(3) excludes vacation pay as wages; §198 requires a qualifying contract and non-executive status; §198-c governs benefits only under a valid agreement. Accrued vacation/sick-pay claim dismissed without prejudice; plaintiff may amend to plead nonstatutory basis or proper §198-c agreement.

Key Cases Cited

  • Overnite Transp. Co. v. Tianti, 926 F.2d 220 (2d Cir.1991) (state overtime not preempted by FLSA; savings clause allows greater state rights)
  • Williamson v. General Dynamics Corp., 208 F.3d 1144 (9th Cir.2000) (savings clause permits parallel/additional remedies)
  • Anderson v. Sara Lee Corp., 508 F.3d 181 (4th Cir.2007) (FLSA exclusive remedies; obstacle preemption; exclusive remedies framework)
  • Lerwill v. Inflight Motion Pictures, Inc., 343 F.Supp.1027 (N.D. Cal.1972) (detailed remedial scheme suggests exclusive private remedies)
  • Chen v. Street Beat Sportswear, Inc., 364 F.Supp.2d 269 (E.D.N.Y.2005) (preemption analysis under FLSA remedial scheme)
  • Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc., 623 F.3d 743 (9th Cir.2010) (FLSA does not preempt state-law claims that borrow its standard)
  • Doo Nam Yang v. ACBL Corp., 427 F.Supp.2d 327 (S.D.N.Y.2005) (spread of hours/defer to DOL; numeric interpretation debates)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sosnowy v. A. Perri Farms, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, E.D. New York
Date Published: Feb 10, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13702
Docket Number: 10-CV-2829 (ADS)(WDW)
Court Abbreviation: E.D.N.Y