History
  • No items yet
midpage
2015 IL App (3d) 140763
Ill. App. Ct.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Duane and Mildred Sorrells sue DK Linde for flooding on their Scotch Pine land allegedly caused by Linde’s development.
  • Plaintiffs later add an inverse condemnation claim against the City of Macomb over drainage from Phases 1 and 2 of Scotch Pine dedicated to the City.
  • City moves to dismiss inverse condemnation counts under section 2-615, asserting immunity under the Local Governmental and Governmental Employees Tort Immunity Act and statute-based defenses.
  • Trial court grants City’s immunity-based 2-615 dismissal; plaintiffs amend complaints multiple times seeking damages and mandamus for condemnation.
  • Court analyzes whether plaintiffs stated a cognizable inverse condemnation claim where drainage from a private development, via streets and detention basins, allegedly damages plaintiffs’ land.
  • Court ultimately holds the third-amended complaint fails to state an inverse condemnation claim because alleged flooding was caused by private development, not government action, and no taking occurred.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Was count IV sufficient to state inverse condemnation? Sorrells: drainage from development and streets constitutes a drainage easement taking. City: allegations fail to show government-caused taking; drainage from private development cannot support inverse condemnation. No; count IV failed to state an inverse condemnation claim.

Key Cases Cited

  • Arkansas Game & Fish Comm’n v. United States, 133 S. Ct. 511 (Supreme Court 2012) (factors for takings; temporary flooding may be compensable)
  • Patzner v. Baise, 133 Ill. 2d 540 (Ill. 1990) (damaged property under Illinois Constitution; distinction from taking)
  • Pratt v. Rosenfield, 399 Ill. 247 (Ill. 1948) (mandamus relief for eminent domain actions; government action context)
  • Rigney v. City of Chicago, 102 Ill. 64 (Ill. 1881) (taking framework; government action requirement for condemnation)
  • Horn v. City of Chicago, 403 Ill. 549 (Ill. 1949) (damaged vs. taken property under Illinois Constitution)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sorrells v. City of Macomb
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jan 29, 2016
Citations: 2015 IL App (3d) 140763; 44 N.E.3d 453; 398 Ill.Dec. 424; 3-14-0763
Docket Number: 3-14-0763
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Sorrells v. City of Macomb, 2015 IL App (3d) 140763