History
  • No items yet
midpage
793 N.W.2d 797
N.D.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Sorenson, surface owner in Mountrail County, sought to quiet title to mineral interests held by the Alinder children.
  • The Alinders acquired their mineral interest in 1953; the interest had remained unused for over 50 years.
  • Sorenson published a lapse notice in January 2007 and mailed it within ten days after the last publication to the address of record.
  • The Alinders' children filed statements of claim to the mineral interests in May 2008; Sorenson filed quiet title, and the children counterclaimed.
  • The district court held Sorenson failed to strictly comply with statute, requiring a 'reasonable inquiry' to locate addresses before mailing.
  • The court reversed, concluding Sorenson’s mailing to the address of record complied with the statute; the 'reasonable inquiry' requirement did not apply.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether 'reasonable inquiry' is required when address is of record Sorenson complied with mailing to address of record District court correctly required reasonable inquiry No, court erred; Sorenson complied and no reasonable inquiry needed

Key Cases Cited

  • Sorenson v. Felton, 2011 ND 33 (2011) (interprets § 38-18.1-06(2) on reasonable inquiry when address not shown of record)
  • Johnson v. Taliaferro, 2011 ND 34 (2011) (confirms when address shows of record, no reasonable inquiry required)
  • Halvorson v. Starr, 2010 ND 133 (2010) (statutory interpretation as a question of law; full review on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sorenson v. Alinder
Court Name: North Dakota Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 8, 2011
Citations: 793 N.W.2d 797; 2011 WL 386863; 175 Oil & Gas Rep. 217; 2011 ND 36; 2011 N.D. LEXIS 23; No. 20100254
Docket Number: No. 20100254
Court Abbreviation: N.D.
Log In
    Sorenson v. Alinder, 793 N.W.2d 797