History
  • No items yet
midpage
Snyder v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10167
Fed. Cir.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Snyder represented veteran Larry Beck under a § 5904 fee agreement (20% of past‑due benefits) beginning in 2001 but terminated representation ~8 months later.
  • In 2003 the VA awarded Beck past‑due benefits (100% rating effective 1992); Snyder sought 20% despite having ceased representation years earlier.
  • The RO initially awarded Snyder $41,920.47; Beck objected and appealed; the Board remanded the fee eligibility to the RO. Beck died in 2006 while the fee dispute was pending.
  • Beck’s widow claimed accrued benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 5121 (periodic monetary benefits due and unpaid at death); the RO denied recovery of the disputed attorney fees and notified Snyder of entitlement to the fee award.
  • The Board sought a precedential opinion from the VA General Counsel, which held that a pending § 5904 attorney‑fee claim can give rise to an accrued‑benefits claim under § 5121 because it concerns periodic monetary benefits allegedly due and unpaid at death.
  • Snyder petitioned for review under 38 U.S.C. § 502 asking the court to set aside the General Counsel opinion; the court denied the petition.

Issues

Issue Snyder's Argument Secretary's Argument Held
Whether the court has jurisdiction to review a precedential General Counsel opinion under 38 U.S.C. § 502 Snyder argued review was proper under § 502 Sec’y argued § 502 jurisdiction is precluded where review is "in connection with" an appeal under chapter 72 and Paralyzed Veterans limits review Court held § 502 jurisdiction exists because precedential General Counsel opinions are agency actions subject to 5 U.S.C. § 552(a)(1) and Splane controls
Whether a pending § 5904 attorney‑fee dispute survives a veteran’s death as basis for an accrued‑benefits claim under § 5121 Snyder argued § 20.1302 dismissal on death terminates pending fee disputes, so no accrued‑benefits claim exists Sec’y argued the General Counsel opinion was a permissible interpretation allowing accrued claims when benefits are due/unpaid at death Court held disputed § 5904 fees can form the basis of an accrued‑benefits claim under § 5121 because fees are deducted from past‑due periodic benefits and thus concern amounts allegedly due and unpaid at death

Key Cases Cited

  • Splane v. West, 216 F.3d 1058 (Fed. Cir. 2000) (court previously exercised § 502 review of a precedential General Counsel opinion)
  • Paralyzed Veterans of Am. v. Sec’y of Veterans Affairs, 308 F.3d 1262 (Fed. Cir. 2002) (addressed limits on judicial review of VA actions requested in connection with Board appeals)
  • Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Mfg. Co., 864 F.2d 757 (Fed. Cir. 1988) (rule that earlier precedential decisions control when two panel decisions conflict)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Snyder v. Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Date Published: Jun 8, 2017
Citation: 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 10167
Docket Number: 2016-1529
Court Abbreviation: Fed. Cir.