History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Time Customer Services
132 So. 3d 841
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Claimant sustained a lumbar spine injury from repetitive lifting; Employer/Carrier (E/C) accepted the claim and authorized medical care.
  • On October 19, 2010, Dr. George Sidhom prescribed an orthopedic mattress and, the same date, a Sleep Number mattress/base for the lumbar condition.
  • January 26, 2011, Claimant filed a petition (PFB) for the orthopedic mattress; March 8, 2011 mediation resulted in E/C agreement to provide the orthopedic mattress.
  • April 18, 2011, Claimant filed a PFB for the Sleep Number mattress; a final PTD hearing occurred May 25, 2011, with adjudication on the Sleep Number claim reserved in June 2011.
  • November 1, 2011, Claimant voluntarily dismissed the April 2011 Sleep Number PFB; February 13, 2012, this court affirmed the June 2011 PTD order; February 21, 2012, a Sleep Number prescription was renewed and a March 7, 2012 PFB filed for that benefit.
  • March 22, 2012, E/C moved for summary final order to dismiss the March 7, 2012 PFB as barred by res judicata; April 9, 2012, JCC granted summary final order dismissing the petition with prejudice.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether summary final order was proper given res judicata issues Claimant argues unresolved facts preclude summary disposal; new prescription supports a distinct claim. E/C contends res judicata bars March 7, 2012 PFB as same underlying theory/claim. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Key Cases Cited

  • Thomas v. Eckerd Drugs, 987 So.2d 1262 (Fla.1st DCA 2008) (de novo standard for summary judgment review)
  • Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach, L.P., 760 So.2d 126 (Fla.2000) (when evidence allows competing inferences, issues go to trier of fact)
  • Begley’s Cleaning Serv. v. Costa, 913 So.2d 1244 (Fla.1st DCA 2005) (summary final order when no genuine issues of material fact)
  • Costa, 913 So.2d 1245 (Fla.1st DCA 2005) (guide to evaluating dispositive issue and record review)
  • Gordon v. Gordon, 59 So.2d 40 (Fla.1952) (res judicata requires identity of thing, cause, parties, and quality)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Time Customer Services
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 31, 2013
Citation: 132 So. 3d 841
Docket Number: No. 1D12-2398
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.