History
  • No items yet
midpage
Smith v. Commonwealth
57 Va. App. 319
Va. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Smith was arrested in June 2006 for felony possession of marijuana with intent to distribute; the GDC continued the case and he remained free on bail.
  • In September–November 2007, defense counsel notified Smith the charge had been certified to the grand jury and a trial date was set for January 2008.
  • On November 15, 2007, Smith went to a pawnshop to buy a .40 caliber handgun and completed ATF Form 4473.
  • On Form 4473, Smith answered “No” to the question about being under indictment or information for a felony or crime punishable by more than one year.
  • The pawnshop declined to complete the sale after a background check revealed the pending felony charge.
  • Smith was charged under Code § 18.2-308.2:2 for making a false statement on the firearm purchase form and was found guilty by the trial court on appeal for willfully and intentionally making a false statement.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Smith’s statement was false and therefore violative of § 18.2-308.2:2(K). Smith argues he lacked scienter because he did not know the meaning of ‘indictment.’ Commonwealth contends a false statement requires only willful and intentional conduct, regardless of understanding the term ‘indictment.’ False statement; willful and intentional conduct established.
Whether the willfulness standard parallels the federal statute requiring knowledge. Smith claims lack of knowledge defeats willfulness. Commonwealth asserts willfulness can be proved by deliberate disregard of truth despite possible lack of knowledge. Virginia statute requires willful and intentional conduct; evidence supports this standard.
Whether the evidence supports the conviction under § 18.2-308.2:2(K). N/A N/A Evidence shows Smith knowingly answered ‘No’ to a question he was aware applied to indictment/information, supporting conviction.

Key Cases Cited

  • Richardson v. Commonwealth, 21 Va.App. 93, 462 S.E.2d 120 (1995) (statutory knowledge and falsity in ATF Form 4473 context)
  • Brogan v. United States, 522 U.S. 398, 118 S. Ct. 805 (1998) (false statement on form requires knowing falsity)
  • Hester v. United States, 880 F.2d 799, 802 (4th Cir. 1989) (1989) (willfulness includes deliberate disregard for truth to avoid learning the truth)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Smith v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Nov 23, 2010
Citation: 57 Va. App. 319
Docket Number: 0364091
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.