Smith v. Atkins
777 F. Supp. 2d 955
E.D.N.C.2011Background
- Burden, diagnosed with schizophrenia, committed suicide in Bertie-Martin Regional Jail on March 28, 2007.
- Plaintiffs sued multiple jail officials and Southern Health Partners under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and North Carolina law, later removed to federal court.
- Intake at jail in March 2007 was negative for suicide risk; Burden had prior suicide-watch in 2005 but no ongoing monitoring noted.
- During incarceration, Burden received some psychotropic medications; Abilify and Ativan were not on the formulary and not distributed.
- Jail policy allowed two-hourly checks unless on suicide watch; Burden had been on suicide watch in 2005 but was not on suicide watch in 2007.
- Defendants moved for summary judgment; the court granted the strike of expert disclosures and granted summary judgment to several defendants.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Was Williams liable under the Eighth Amendment? | Plaintiffs contend Williams knew of Burden's risk and disregarded it. | Williams did not know Burden or his risk and did not have custody responsibilities. | No liability; Williams granted summary judgment. |
| Did Friedman, White, Whitehurst, and Ryan act with deliberate indifference to Burden's suicide risk? | Defendants ignored four-hour checks and past suicide history; failed to recall 2005 suicide watch. | No subjective knowledge of substantial risk; Burden showed no suicidal behavior; actions were not deliberate indifference. | No Eighth Amendment violation; summary judgment granted. |
| Can Southern Health Partners and Jones be liable under § 1983 for failure to train or to have policies? | Failure to train or govern in suicide risk caused the deprivation. | No underlying constitutional violation; policies and training existed; no causal link shown. | No liability; summary judgment granted. |
Key Cases Cited
- Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825 (1994) (deliberate indifference standard requires knowledge of substantial risk and disregard)
- Iko v. Shreve, 535 F.3d 225 (4th Cir.2008) (two-prong requirement for Eighth Amendment claim in prison medical care)
- Collins v. Seeman, 462 F.3d 757 (7th Cir.2006) (deliberate indifference standard in medical care context)
- Brown v. Harris, 240 F.3d 383 (4th Cir.2001) (deliberate indifference and medical care standards)
- Monell v. Dep't of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (1978) (municipal liability requires official policy or custom)
- Bd. of Cnty. Comm'rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397 (1997) (deliberate indifference and causation in municipal liability)
- Riddick v. Sch. Bd., 238 F.3d 518 (4th Cir.2000) (deliberate indifference and final policymaker liability framework)
- West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42 (1988) (applying municipal and corporate liability standards for medical care)
