Slack v. State
288 Ga. 659
Ga.2011Background
- Slack and Travis Scott were at Valerie Robinson's apartment with others, consuming alcohol and drugs.
- Slack was observed with a Tech-9 pistol and, after a sequence of events, shot Scott in the head, killing him.
- Roberts witnessed the shooting, was shot in the leg while fleeing, and saw Slack continue firing at him.
- All bullets at the scene were fired from a 9 millimeter pistol, the same caliber as the Tech-9.
- Slack was indicted on malice murder, felony murder, aggravated assault, possession of a firearm during a crime, and possession of a firearm by a felon/first offender; he was tried on Counts 1–4 and found guilty, with Count 5 found guilty by the court.
- The trial court sentenced Slack to life on malice murder, five years for possession during a crime (concurrent with Count 1), and five years for firearm by felon/first offender (concurrent with Count 4 and consecutive to Count 1). Count 3 merged for sentencing; Count 2 was vacated by operation of law.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sufficiency of the evidence | Slack claims the evidence does not support his convictions. | Slack argues insufficient evidence to sustain the verdicts. | Evidence sufficient; rational jury could find guilt beyond reasonable doubt. |
| Merger/double jeopardy of felony murder and aggravated assault | Slack contends merging created multiple convictions for same conduct in violation of OCGA 16-1-7. | State argues proper factual and legal merger; no new convictions after malice murder. | Felony murder vacated by operation of law; aggravated assault merger proper for sentencing. |
| Ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to investigate mental illness history | Slack asserts trial counsel failed to investigate mental illness history, constituting ineffective assistance. | Claim not preserved; new counsel did not raise it below; lack of record defeats it. | Claim fails; not properly preserved and record shows no trial-court basis argued. |
Key Cases Cited
- Bell v. State, 287 Ga. 670, 697 S.E.2d 793 (2010) (distinguishes convictions from judgments of conviction; merger context)
- Malcolm v. State, 263 Ga. 369, 434 S.E.2d 479 (1993) (merger principles and sentencing merger guidance)
- Walker v. Hale, 283 Ga. 131, 657 S.E.2d 227 (2008) (double jeopardy and convictions vs. prosecutions)
- Jennings v. State, 282 Ga. 679, 653 S.E.2d 17 (2007) (ineffective assistance of counsel; preservation rules)
- Pruitt v. State, 279 Ga. 140, 611 S.E.2d 47 (2005) (ineffective assistance; preservation and review standards)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 61 L. Ed. 2d 560 (1981) (sufficiency of evidence standard for guilty verdicts)
