History
  • No items yet
midpage
368 P.3d 264
Wyo.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Sky Harbor operated an FBO at Cheyenne Regional Airport under a lease (terminated Dec. 31, 2011 unless extended by conditions Sky Harbor failed to meet) and later leased a Paint Shop; Sky Harbor fell behind on rent and other obligations.
  • Sky Harbor assigned its interest in the FBO lease to its lender as collateral in connection with an SBA loan; the assignment preserved Sky Harbor’s continuing liability and gave the bank 60 days to cure any default notice.
  • The Airport notified the bank and Sky Harbor of default (Oct. 6, 2010); the Airport terminated the FBO lease (Dec. 23, 2010); the bank entered FDIC receivership in Jan. 2011.
  • Separate litigation: federal suit over the Paint Shop resulted in a large judgment for the Airport; state actions included ejectment (District Court), forcible entry and detainer (Circuit Court), and a garnishment action to collect judgments.
  • Sky Harbor moved to dismiss state proceedings, arguing FIRREA required the Airport to exhaust administrative claims against the failed bank/FDIC and thus state courts lacked subject matter jurisdiction.
  • The Wyoming District and Circuit Courts entered judgments for the Airport on ejectment, FED, and garnishment; Sky Harbor appealed. The Wyoming Supreme Court affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Sky Harbor) Defendant's Argument (Airport) Held
Whether state courts lacked subject-matter jurisdiction because FIRREA required administrative exhaustion against the failed bank/FDIC FIRREA bars courts from adjudicating claims involving assets/acts of failed banks; Airport should have submitted claims to FDIC claims process Airport’s claims are against Sky Harbor (tenant), not the bank/FDIC; the lease left Sky Harbor liable and the bank had no obligation to pay rents; FIRREA does not apply Court held state courts had jurisdiction; FIRREA did not bar these suits because Airport sought relief against Sky Harbor, not bank assets or FDIC acts, and administrative process would be futile or inapplicable
Whether the Airport’s federal Paint Shop judgment (and resulting garnishment) could be collaterally attacked in state court because of alleged EDA/other defects Federal judgment invalid because EDA disallowance (or FIRREA issues) nullifies the federal judgment and thus garnishment Federal judgment was affirmed on appeal (Tenth Circuit); state courts cannot collaterally attack a valid federal judgment Court held federal judgment and related garnishment stand; state court cannot relitigate or collaterally attack the federal decision
Whether summary judgment and ejectment were proper given lease-extension and breach disputes Lease was extended (various asserted bases) or defenses entitle Sky Harbor to remain; factual disputes required trial Extension conditions were undisputedly unmet; Sky Harbor produced no evidence to create genuine issues of material fact Court affirmed summary judgment/ejectment: lease expired (no valid extension) and Sky Harbor breached payment/insurance obligations
Whether FDIC/Bank were indispensable parties and joinder required FDIC/Bank had interests in assigned lease; their absence deprived the court of complete relief and required joinder Airport’s claims sought relief only against Sky Harbor; FDIC/Bank rights were unaffected and not required for just adjudication Court held joinder unnecessary: FDIC/Bank were not required parties for Airport’s claims against Sky Harbor and joinder was not compelled

Key Cases Cited

  • Am. Nat’l Ins. Co. v. FDIC, 642 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir.) (FIRREA exhaustion may be excused where administrative process is futile)
  • Gilmore v. Weatherford, 694 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir.) (administrative exhaustion unnecessary when process cannot provide relief)
  • Henrichs v. Valley View Dev., 474 F.3d 609 (9th Cir.) (FIRREA exhaustion applies only when FDIC is in possession of bank assets)
  • Rundgren v. Washington Mut. Bank, FA, 760 F.3d 1056 (9th Cir.) (FIRREA governs claims based on assets/acts/omissions of failed depository institutions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sky Harbor Air Service, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation, and H. Paul Martin v. Cheyenne Regional Airport Board, a Wyoming Corporation
Court Name: Wyoming Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 9, 2016
Citations: 368 P.3d 264; 2016 Wyo. LEXIS 17; 2016 WY 17; S-15-0143, S-15-0144, S-15-0145
Docket Number: S-15-0143, S-15-0144, S-15-0145
Court Abbreviation: Wyo.
Log In
    Sky Harbor Air Service, Inc., a Wyoming Corporation, and H. Paul Martin v. Cheyenne Regional Airport Board, a Wyoming Corporation, 368 P.3d 264