Simon v. Simon
2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1899
| Ind. Ct. App. | 2011Background
- Melvin Simon died in 2009; Bren Simon served as Personal Representative of the Estate and Trustee of the Trust.
- In 2009 Melvin’s estate plan was amended, increasing Bren’s inheritance and reducing children’s and charitable allocations.
- Deborah Simon filed Estate and Trust disputes in 2010 alleging capacity flaws and undue influence, later consolidated.
- SPGLP units held by the Trust could be converted to SPG stock or cash; SPG claimed the Estate Dispute could be a lien on units.
- Judge Hughes oversaw the Estate Dispute and Trust Dispute; he prohibited further distributions without court approval after an evidentiary hearing.
- On December 1, 2010 Judge Hughes refused Bren’s objection to his presiding, and on December 15, 2010 Bren was removed as Personal Representative and Trustee; Bren then sought certification of an interlocutory appeal, which the court granted, but she had been removed and thus lacked standing to pursue the appeal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standing to pursue an interlocutory appeal after removal | Bren maintained standing as aggrieved party for appeal | Bren lacked standing once removed; representation ended | Dismissed for lack of standing |
| Effect of removal on collateral-order appeal against recusal ruling | Bren sought review of denial to disqualify the judge | No standing post-removal; appeal not permissible | Dismissed for lack of jurisdiction |
Key Cases Cited
- Weiland v. Scheuch, 123 Ind.App. 421, 111 N.E.2d 664 (1953) (standing and aggrieved party status in probate appeals)
- Pence v. State, 652 N.E.2d 486 (Ind. 1995) (standing requires an actual injury or interest)
- McFarland v. Pierce, 151 Ind. 546, 45 N.E.706 (1897) (definition of ‘aggrieved’ in appeals)
- Treacy v. State, 953 N.E.2d 634 (Ind.Ct.App.2011) (Rule 17 and party-of-record requirements on appeal)
- In re Estate of Eguia, 917 N.E.2d 166 (Ind.Ct.App.2009) (aggrieved by probate court judgment must have adverse legal interest)
