History
  • No items yet
midpage
Simon v. Commonwealth
708 S.E.2d 245
Va. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Appellant was convicted by jury of indecent liberties under Code § 18.2-370(A)(1) for acts against a 10-year-old girl, K.K.
  • Evidence showed appellant was seen at a CVS parking lot with a vehicle and red shorts with a hole, exposing himself to K.K. on August 26, 2009.
  • A second sighting occurred August 28, 2009; on August 31, 2009 police found red shorts with a hole and pornographic material in appellant's truck.
  • K.K. and her father reported the incidents; a police stop led to discovery of the shorts and pornographic items.
  • Appellant sought a jury instruction on indecent exposure as a lesser included offense; the court refused.
  • The trial court denied motions to strike for insufficiency of evidence on lascivious intent; appellant did not present evidence.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
whether indecent exposure is a lesser included offense Simon argues Ashby/Hewitt imply lesser inclusion Commonwealth contends exposure not lesser included due to different elements/intent Not lesser included; court did not err
whether evidence proves lascivious intent Simon asserts insufficient proof of lascivious intent Commonwealth contends totality shows intent beyond reasonable doubt Evidence sufficient to prove lascivious intent

Key Cases Cited

  • Ashby v. Commonwealth, 208 Va. 443 (1968) (dicta on indecent exposure; not controlling for lesser-included issues)
  • Hewitt v. Commonwealth, 213 Va. 605 (1973) (cited as reference for lesser-included status; dictum in this context)
  • McKeon v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 24 (1970) (reiterates lascivious intent may be proven by various factors)
  • Sanchez v. Commonwealth, 32 Va.App. 238 (2000) (defines test for lesser-included offenses; elements-based analysis)
  • Dalton v. Commonwealth, 259 Va. 249 (2000) (articulates elements-inclusion test for lesser offense)
  • Campbell v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 196 (1984) (discusses interpretation of 'lascivious' intent)
  • Mason v. Commonwealth, 49 Va.App. 39 (2006) (recognizes multiple avenues to prove lascivious intent)
  • Kauffmann v. Commonwealth, 8 Va.App. 400 (1989) (notes variety of indicators for lascivious intent)
  • Seibert v. Commonwealth, 22 Va.App. 40 (1996) (discusses abstract element-based analysis)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Simon v. Commonwealth
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: May 3, 2011
Citation: 708 S.E.2d 245
Docket Number: 0909104
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.