History
  • No items yet
midpage
Simmons v. Himmelreich
136 S. Ct. 1843
| SCOTUS | 2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Walter Himmelreich, a federal prisoner, filed an FTCA suit against the United States alleging negligence by Bureau of Prisons officials for housing him with an inmate who brutally assaulted him.
  • The Government moved to dismiss the FTCA suit under the FTCA “Exceptions” for discretionary functions (28 U.S.C. §2680(a)); the District Court granted that motion.
  • While the FTCA suit was pending, Himmelreich filed a second suit against individual BOP employees alleging constitutional torts based on the same underlying facts.
  • After dismissal of the FTCA action, the individual employees invoked the FTCA judgment-bar provision (28 U.S.C. §2676) to obtain summary judgment, arguing the FTCA judgment barred subsequent suits against employees for the same subject matter.
  • The Sixth Circuit reversed the district court; the Supreme Court granted certiorari to resolve whether the judgment bar applies to claims dismissed under the FTCA “Exceptions.”

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the FTCA judgment-bar (§2676) applies when an FTCA suit is dismissed because it falls within an FTCA “Exception” (e.g., discretionary-function exception) The judgment bar does not apply to suits dismissed under the FTCA Exceptions; §2680(a) says provisions of Chapter 171 "shall not apply" to such claims, so §2676 is excluded The judgment bar is a Chapter 171 provision and should apply even if the FTCA claim was dismissed under an Exception; otherwise judgment bar would be rendered ineffective The judgment bar does not apply to FTCA claims dismissed under the Exceptions (discretionary-function). The Court enforces the plain text of §2680(a).

Key Cases Cited

  • United States v. Smith, 499 U.S. 160 (1991) (interpreting application of Chapter 171’s exclusive-remedies provision in light of the Liability Reform Act)
  • Will v. Hallock, 546 U.S. 345 (2006) (discussing judgment-bar provision’s resemblance to claim-preclusion principles)
  • Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 (1953) (FTCA’s purpose to channel liability to the United States)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Simmons v. Himmelreich
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Jun 6, 2016
Citation: 136 S. Ct. 1843
Docket Number: 15–109.
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS