Silver v. Doubles, 2:22-cv-00578

Frederick O. Silver sued major credit reporting agencies (Equifax, Experian, and Trans Union) in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah.
Silver's claims were challenged by defendants, who moved to dismiss based on timeliness and failure to state a claim.
Silver filed motions for a temporary restraining order (TRO), a preliminary injunction, and to amend his complaint for a fourth time.
A Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation advising dismissal with prejudice and denial of Silver's motions.
Silver filed an objection to the report, but it was untimely.
The District Court adopted the Report and Recommendation, dismissed the case with prejudice, and denied all of Silver’s pending motions.

Issue	Plaintiff's Argument	Defendant's Argument	Held
Statute of limitations	Claims should not be time-barred	Claims are time-barred	Claims time-barred
Failure to state a claim	Complaint alleges sufficient facts	Complaint fails to state a claim	Complaint insufficient
TRO/Preliminary Injunction	Entitled to immediate injunctive relief	No basis for relief	Relief denied
Leave to amend complaint	Should be allowed to file another amendment	Amendment futile and unduly delayed	Leave denied

Lemmons v. Houston, 633 Fed.Appx. 664 (10th Cir. 2015) (affirmed district court's refusal to consider untimely pro se objections to magistrate reports)