History
  • No items yet
midpage
840 N.W.2d 1
Mich. Ct. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Cottage on St. Joseph River jointly owned; partition sale ordered after unsuccessful partition; plaintiff bought at auction.
  • Trial court awarded defendant 75% of sale proceeds after deducting commissioner’s expenses and plaintiff’s $8,359.20 in fees/costs.
  • Court denied additional attorney fees for plaintiff and rejected defendant’s claim that some plaintiff claims were frivolous.
  • Ownership history: defendant acquired his interest from his father; plaintiff acquired Carole’s share via quitclaim in 2007.
  • Trial court found expenses were shared since 2000; maintenance largely by defendant; personal property largely owned by defendant’s family.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether 75% proceeds to defendant was proper Silich not entitled to >50%. Defendant conferred greater benefits on premises. No; 50/50 split required; unequal distribution reversed.
Scope of attorney fees under MCR 3.403(C) Fees should cover all related to partition and sale. Only fees to file suit and arrange sale are recoverable. Only fees related to filing suit and organizing the sale recoverable.
Amount of plaintiff's attorney fees Award should reflect all recoverable work. Inadequate differentiation of recoverable work; $8,000 deemed reasonable. Court not clearly erroneous; $8,000 reasonable under the circumstances.
Defendant's request for fees for personal-property dispute Dispute not frivolous; fees should be denied only if frivolous. Personal-property claim frivolous and merits fees. Claim not frivolous; no fee-shifting to plaintiff.
Whether ordering sale before determining relative entitlement was proper Rule requires determine shares before sale. Not required; moot since sale completed. Not reversible; procedure not error given mootness.

Key Cases Cited

  • Fenton v. Miller, 116 Mich 45 (1898) (rents and improvements charged between owners at time they were incurred)
  • Nemeth v Abonmarche Dev, Inc, 457 Mich 16 (1998) (American rule on attorney fees; exceptions by statute or court rule)
  • Valeo Switches & Detection Sys, Inc v EMCom, Inc, 272 Mich App 309 (2006) (read statutory language with common-law adjudicatory principles)
  • Smith v Khouri, 481 Mich 519 (2008) (guides reasonable hourly rate and hours expended in attorney fee awards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Silich v. Rongers
Court Name: Michigan Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 8, 2013
Citations: 840 N.W.2d 1; 302 Mich. App. 137; Docket No. 305680
Docket Number: Docket No. 305680
Court Abbreviation: Mich. Ct. App.
Log In
    Silich v. Rongers, 840 N.W.2d 1