History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sierra Club v. Korleski
681 F.3d 342
| 6th Cir. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Ohio chose not to administer a federal Clean Air Act regulation and remains subject to SIP provisions.
  • Sierra Club and others sued Ohio EPA Director under §7604(a)(1) to compel BAT determinations before permits for small emitters.
  • District court granted partial summary judgment ordering immediate BAT enforcement.
  • EPA has not enforced BAT or used sanctions, and Ohio’s SIP remains in effect but not actively enforced.
  • Sierra Club sought to use citizen-suit authority against the state regulator; case proceeded on appeal to Sixth Circuit.
  • Court reverses, remands to dismiss for lack of authority under §7604(a)(1).

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether §7604(a)(1) allows suit against a state regulator to enforce BAT Sierra Club reads 'violation' to include regulator failure to enforce BAT Ohio contends 'violation' targets regulated parties, not regulators No; cannot sue regulator qua regulator under §7604(a)(1)
Whether 'emission standard or limitation' includes SIP enforcement obligations BAT DUTY in SIP constitutes a standard/limitation BAT obligation is a SIP enforcement duty, not a permit standard Not a private enforcement target under §7604(a)(1) against regulator
Whether Bennett v. Spear governs interpretation of 'violation' Analogous; includes regulator inaction as violation Bennett excludes regulator failures under §7604(a)(1) Bennett controls; cannot treat regulator inaction as 'violation'
Whether Highway Safety remains good law for this issue Highway Safety supports private action against state regulator Highway Safety is distinguishable; not controlling post-Bennett Not controlling; doctrine of Bennett applies

Key Cases Cited

  • Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (1997) ('violation' cannot reach regulator's maladministration)
  • United States v. Ohio Department of Highway Safety, 635 F.2d 1195 (6th Cir. 1980) (earlier, pre-Bennett view allowing regulator as violator)
  • Ellis v. Gallatin Steel Co., 390 F.3d 461 (6th Cir. 2004) (cooperative federalism in the Clean Air Act)
  • New York v. United States, 505 U.S. 144 (1992) (federal government cannot compel states to enact/administer federal programs)
  • Sackett v. EPA, 132 S. Ct. 1367 (2012) (context on agency action and enforcement)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sierra Club v. Korleski
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: May 25, 2012
Citation: 681 F.3d 342
Docket Number: 10-3269
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.