History
  • No items yet
midpage
247 So. 3d 1175
La. Ct. App.
2018
Read the full case

Background

  • Homeowner Shreves' house had a large oak tree fall in October 2009; State Farm paid for initial repairs but in 2012 the Shreves discovered a major slab crack and filed a claim.
  • State Farm hired Donan Engineering (Hassenboehler), which concluded drought-driven differential settlement (not the tree) caused the slab crack; State Farm denied coverage based on that causation and a policy exclusion for settlement-related damage.
  • The Shreves sued (2013); they later produced an engineer (Gadberry) who opined the tree impact caused the crack; State Farm then retained Dr. Householder, who agreed with settlement/drought causation.
  • A jury found (1) the tree caused the foundation crack, (2) State Farm owed $130,600 under the policy (offset by prior payments), and (3) State Farm acted arbitrarily/capriciously in handling the claim, awarding $140,000 in noncontractual damages.
  • The trial judge found the date of loss was December 2011, limited contractual damages consistent with offsets, but granted State Farm’s JNOV vacating the jury’s bad-faith/noncontractual damages and attorney-fee awards; Shreves appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether State Farm acted arbitrarily, capriciously, or without probable cause in denying the claim (bad-faith claim under La. R.S. 22:1973) State Farm relied on cursory/unsupervised experts, failed adequate investigation, shifted defenses, and misled re: prescription—supporting bad faith. State Farm had a reasonable, good-faith basis to deny coverage because expert opinions conflicted (drought/differential settlement vs. tree impact); it reasonably relied on its experts. JNOV proper: reasonable jurors could not find State Farm acted in bad faith given conflicting expert opinions and timely investigation.
Adequacy of insurer’s reliance on outside experts and investigation Shreves: insurer unreasonably delegated and accepted flawed expert work without scrutiny. State Farm: it reasonably relied on independent engineering reports and obtained a peer review and a second independent expert when conflict arose. Held for State Farm: relying on qualified experts and obtaining a second opinion was reasonable under the circumstances.
Whether State Farm misled insured as to prescriptive period (policy one-year provision) Shreves: insurer attempted to rely on void one-year policy provision and created jury confusion, constituting bad faith. State Farm: any questions about the policy period did not lull or mislead; the jury was not instructed on timing and court decided prescriptive issue pre-trial. Held for State Farm: no evidence of misleading conduct that lulled plaintiffs; no reversible error.
Whether trial judge erred by considering witness credibility when granting JNOV Shreves: judge improperly evaluated credibility (which is for jury) when granting JNOV. State Farm: judge’s comments acknowledged he did not resolve credibility but concluded evidence overwhelmingly supported insurer’s position. Held for State Farm: judge did not improperly decide credibility for JNOV; his remarks reflected that evidence could only reasonably support insurer on bad-faith issue.

Key Cases Cited

  • Reed v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 857 So.2d 1012 (La. 2003) (defines "arbitrary, capricious, or without probable cause" and discusses vexatious refusal to pay)
  • Louisiana Maintenance Servs., Inc. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's of London, 616 So.2d 1250 (La. 1993) (discusses insurer duties and standards for bad-faith claims)
  • Guillory v. Lee, 16 So.3d 1104 (La. 2009) (insurer not liable for penalties/fees when a reasonable basis exists to defend claim)
  • Davis v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 774 So.2d 84 (La. 2000) (standard for granting JNOV)
  • Cooper v. Farmers Ins. Exch., 210 So.3d 829 (La. App. 2 Cir. 2016) (penal statutes construed strictly regarding insurer penalties)
  • Jones v. Johnson, 56 So.3d 1016 (La. App. 2 Cir. 2010) (same principle on strict construction of penal insurance statutes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Shreve v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: May 23, 2018
Citations: 247 So. 3d 1175; No. 52,032–CA
Docket Number: No. 52,032–CA
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In