History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shirley v. Heckman
75 A.3d 421
Md. Ct. Spec. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Shirley coached in the League since 2000 and faced volatility and controversy during his tenure.
  • A parent accused Shirley of verbally abusing a volunteer play monitor after the November 15, 2009 playoff game.
  • The Board suspended Shirley indefinitely at its November 18, 2009 meeting and notified him via email (the Notification).
  • Shirley appealed the suspension under League rules; the appeal was expedited for the following weekend’s game, and the Suspension Hearing occurred on November 20, 2009.
  • Shirley filed suit alleging defamation against League President Heckman and the League; the circuit court granted summary judgment to the defendants on the defamation claim based on the common interest/qualified privilege.
  • On appeal, the court held the common interest privilege applied and was not abused, affirming summary judgment for Heckman and the League.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the common interest privilege was abused by the defendants' statements. Shirley argues malice or improper purpose show abuse of the privilege. Heckman and the League contend the privilege covers communications within the disciplinary process. No abuse; privilege upheld.

Key Cases Cited

  • Piscatelli v. Smith, 424 Md. 294 (Md. 2012) (malice standard for abuse of privilege)
  • Gohari v. Darvish, 363 Md. 42 (Md. 2001) (common and related privileges; purpose of privilege)
  • Le Marc’s Management Corp. v. Valentin, 349 Md. 645 (Md. 1998) (malice standard for punitive damages and privilege abuse)
  • Marchesi v. Franchino, 283 Md. 131 (Md. 1978) (malice standard tied to privilege eligibility)
  • Ellerin v. Fairfax Sav. F.S.B., 337 Md. 216 (Md. 1995) (malice standard in defamation cases governing privilege)
  • Hanrahan v. Kelly, 269 Md. 21 (Md. 1973) (common interest privilege scope and malice considerations)
  • Happy 40, Inc. v. Miller, 63 Md.App. 24 (Md. Ct. App. 1985) (appellate discussion of defamation privileges in organizational settings)
  • McDermott v. Hughley, 317 Md. 12 (Md. 1989) (examples of privilege and related defamation considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Shirley v. Heckman
Court Name: Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Date Published: Sep 6, 2013
Citation: 75 A.3d 421
Docket Number: No. 633
Court Abbreviation: Md. Ct. Spec. App.