midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
323 P.3d 551
Or. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • SPBC formed in 1999 with Taggart, Jehnke, Hoffard, Benthin; Emmert joins in 2003.
  • Taggart transfers SPBC interest to BT of Sherwood, LLC (BT), a 100% Taggart-owned entity.
  • BT later becomes owner of Taggart’s BT stake; Taggart’s 25% SPBC interest appears to transfer.
  • Berman (SPBC’s attorney) later buys into BT; Taggart and Berman’s related transfers occur through 2007–2008.
  • SPBC loans and guarantees; Taggart’s fiduciary breaches and diverted funds precede litigation.
  • Trial court voids Taggart transfer to BT for lack of proof under ORS 63.249(6) and expels Taggart; BT has no SPBC interest.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Taggart’s SPBC transfer to BT was valid Taggart transferred ownership to BT; notice and proof complied. Notice existed but proof lacked; transfer invalid until proof. Transfer not valid; SPBC not bound; proof not provided when BT controlled by Taggart.
Whether Taggart could be expelled despite the transfer Expulsion proper due to wrongful conduct; transfer does not defeat expulsion. If transfer valid, expulsion improper. Expulsion proper; transfer lacked effectiveness; Taggart expelled January 1, 2008.
Whether Emmert and Jehnke owed fiduciary duties to BT BT could rely on fiduciary duties; breach alleged by BT. No fiduciary obligation to BT; no breach if any existed. No fiduciary obligation to BT; no breach.
Date and method for calculating Taggart’s buyout Use January 1, 2008 value and current rate as of judgment. Use event date of expulsion and relevant rate. Date of event giving rise to purchase election is the judgment entry date; value calculated accordingly.

Key Cases Cited

  • State v. Gaines, 346 Or 160 (2009) (determine statutory intent by text and context)
  • State v. Briney, 345 Or 505 (2008) (plain meaning of terms used in statute)
  • Yogman v. Parrott, 325 Or 358 (1997) (contracts interpretation framework)
  • Housing Authority of Jackson County v. Gates, 246 Or App 521 (2011) (contract interpretation and appellate review standards)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sherwood Park Business Center, LLC v. Taggart
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Date Published: Mar 19, 2014
Citations: 323 P.3d 551; 261 Or. App. 609; C08554CV; A148908, A148927
Docket Number: C08554CV; A148908, A148927
Court Abbreviation: Or. Ct. App.
Log In
    Sherwood Park Business Center, LLC v. Taggart, 323 P.3d 551