History
  • No items yet
midpage
Sherck v. Bremke
2012 Ohio 3527
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • 1956 plat dedicated five streets for public use; recording vested the city with fee interest.
  • 1981 Shercks purchased two lots along unconstructed Fairlain Drive and began using the route.
  • 1982 city vacated Fairlain Drive; some access rights argued to persist.
  • 1999 Bremkes purchased corner Lot at Butternut/Fairlain; Shercks allegedly discussed access and obtained revocable license.
  • Bremkes later erected fence and revoked license, seeking to enforce property boundaries.
  • Trial court granted summary judgment for Shercks under R.C. 723.08; appellate court reverses remit for factual determination of necessity at time of vacation.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether 723.08 applies to vacated streets not accepted. Bremkes: 723.08 only applies to accepted streets. Shercks: 723.08 applies to any street dedicated to public use. 723.08 applies to any street dedicated to public use; rule affirmed.
Whether there is a genuine issue of material fact on reasonable necessity at time of vacation. Shercks: necessity existed then to access Fairlain Drive. Bremkes: no clear necessity at time of vacation. Remanded to determine if access was reasonably necessary at the time of vacation.
Whether Shercks waived their right to an easement. Shercks: post-evacuation actions cannot waive existing easement. Bremkes: such actions could waive rights. Waiver claim overruled; post-vacation actions irrelevant to time-of-vacation assessment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Callen v. Columbus Edison Elec. Light Co., 66 Ohio St. 166 (1902) (establishes equitable easement and reversionary interests in abutting owners upon vacation of streets)
  • Eggert v. Puleo, 67 Ohio St.3d 78 (1993) (plat recording creates municipal fee interest and potential acceptance rules)
  • Greenberg v. L. I. Snodgrass Co., 161 Ohio St. 351 (1954) (vacation of street; abutting owners have access rights; important precedence)
  • Butzer v. Johns, 67 Ohio App.2d 41 (1979) (abutting access considerations when a street is vacated; relevant to necessity analysis)
  • State ex rel. Bedard v. Village of Lockbourne, 69 Ohio App.3d 452 (1990) (reversionary interests and access rights upon vacation of streets)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Sherck v. Bremke
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Aug 6, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 3527
Docket Number: 11CA010078
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.