History
  • No items yet
midpage
88 A.3d 228
Pa. Super. Ct.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Lease covers 62 acres of oil and gas rights on a 62-acre parcel; Baxters reserved half of the rights; bonus paid for 31 acres only; Plaintiffs later acquired the reserved 31 acres via quiet title (2008); Extension payment in 2011 extended the lease for five years covering all 62 acres; trial court held the lease covers all 62 acres and is extended; Plaintiffs argue estoppel by deed bars enforcement of lease to all 62 acres; lease contains warranty and pro rata rent/royalty provisions; Plaintiffs obtain additional title to remaining 31 acres in 2008 and dispute whether pre-extension payment was proper and binding; appellate standard of review applied to legal conclusions without dispute of underlying facts.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the lease covers all oil and gas rights on the 62 acres Shedden ownership at execution was 31 acres Lease covers 62 acres via warranty and estoppel by deed Yes, lease covers 62 acres
Whether estoppel by deed bars Sheddens from contesting the lease After-acquired title should void the extent of the lease Estoppel by deed and warranty prevent denial Yes, estoppel by deed applied
Whether the 2011 Lease Extension payment validly extended the lease for 62 acres Extension payment should only cover 31 acres Extension covered all 62 acres Yes, valid extension for all 62 acres
Whether Plaintiffs’ initial one-half ownership affected Anadarko’s rights to extend Only half of rights leased; cannot bind full parcel Lease and extension applicable to full 62 acres; estoppel rule applies Yes, full 62-acre lease extended
How estoppel doctrine applies given a warranty against title Warranty does not bind after-acquired title Warranty and estoppel align to enforce full lease Enshrined by estoppel; favorable to Anadarko

Key Cases Cited

  • Dixon v. Fuller, 46 A. 553 (Pa.1900) (estoppel by deed when title afterward acquired benefits grantee)
  • Hennebont Co. v. Kroger Co., 289 A.2d 229 (Pa. Super. 1972) (leases when title acquired later apply to lease as estoppel)
  • Duhig v. Peavy-Moore Lumber Co., 144 S.W.2d 878 (Tex. 1940) (estoppel by title in oil and gas leases)
  • Greenshields v. Superior Oil Co., 233 P.2d 959 (Okla. 1951) (persuasive authority on estoppel by deed in oil and gas context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Shedden v. Anadarko E & P Co.
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 14, 2014
Citations: 88 A.3d 228; 182 Oil & Gas Rep. 455; 2014 WL 996251; 2014 Pa. Super. LEXIS 129; 2014 Pa. Super. 53
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
Log In
    Shedden v. Anadarko E & P Co., 88 A.3d 228