Shawn Garrett v. Andria Garrett
1440164
| Va. Ct. App. | Apr 18, 2017Background
- Shawn and Andria Garrett married in 1999; wife filed for divorce on grounds of adultery in June 2015; three minor children were involved.
- Trial was set for June 7, 2016; husband did not appear after a protective-order hearing on June 6; wife proceeded to trial and presented testimony and a corroborating witness (after an inadvertent rest).
- Wife testified husband had been discharged from the Marines (2011), lost a government contract position, and had about a $109,000 prior salary; she removed roughly $65–68,000 from a joint account while husband was hospitalized and used funds for fees/debt.
- Husband later filed a motion to reopen, claiming hospitalization and medication-related incapacity; the trial court found his absence explanation not credible and denied reopening.
- The trial court entered a decree granting wife a divorce a mensa et thoro (later determined clerical), awarded wife the entire marital share of husband’s military pension, 18 months of GI Bill benefits, non-modifiable spousal support, child support based on imputed income, and did not require repayment of the withdrawn joint funds.
- On appeal the Court of Appeals: affirmed many procedural rulings and the income imputation; reversed awards of GI Bill benefits, the entirety of the marital pension share, and the non-modifiable spousal support; remanded equitable distribution, support determinations, and clerical correction to a divorce a vinculo matrimonii.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument (Husband) | Defendant's Argument (Wife) | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Denial of continuance for husband’s absence | Court abused discretion; husband was unable to attend due to hospitalization and medication | Trial court properly exercised discretion; husband was aware of date and counsel could not contact him | Denial affirmed — no prejudice shown and no preserved due-process claim |
| Motion to reopen evidence (post-trial) & wife reopening at trial | Court should have reopened to allow husband to present evidence of hospitalization | Court properly allowed wife to reopen when witness was present and denied husband’s late reopening | Denial of husband's reopen affirmed; granting wife's reopen affirmed as within discretion |
| Award of 18 months of GI Bill benefits to wife | Error: trial court improperly awarded federally controlled transferable benefits husband could not transfer after discharge | Wife sought equitable distribution including educational benefits | Reversed — court abused discretion because federal law prohibits ordering transfer post-discharge |
| Award of entire marital share of military pension and non-modifiable spousal support | Error: court exceeded statute (pension >50% of marital share) and improperly made spousal support non-modifiable | Wife argued equitable distribution discretion and support award were appropriate | Reversed — pension award violated Code limiting awards to 50% of marital share; non-modifiable spousal support prohibited absent agreement; remanded for recalculation |
Key Cases Cited
- Venable v. Venable, 2 Va. App. 178 (discretion on continuance motions)
- Autry v. Bryan, 224 Va. 451 (appellate review of continuance rulings; must show prejudice)
- Shooltz v. Shooltz, 27 Va. App. 264 (motions to reopen evidence are discretionary; error of law is abuse of discretion)
- Niblett v. Niblett, 65 Va. App. 616 (imputing income based on prior earnings/current capacity)
- Lane v. Lane, 32 Va. App. 125 (parties may contract for non-modifiable support but absent agreement court cannot)
