History
  • No items yet
midpage
Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. Yarto International Group, LP
2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 4384
| Tex. App. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Shamoun & Norman, LLP sued Yarto and YIG in Hidalgo County asserting claims including professional negligence and breach of fiduciary duty.
  • Shamoun sought to transfer venue to Travis or Dallas Counties and opposed an anti-suit injunction brought by YIG in Hidalgo County.
  • YIG intervened and sought an anti-suit injunction to bar Shamoun from filing in other venues.
  • A December 9, 2010 global settlement included venue provisions favoring Travis County and a Shamoun-related release, with Shamoun not being a signatory to the settlement.
  • Shamoun moved for transfer after settlement discussions; YIG sought to enforce the injunction and preserve Hidalgo County as proper venue for its claims.
  • The court granted a temporary anti-suit injunction which Shamoun challenged on appeal; Shamoun also appealed the venue denial and sought mandamus relief.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Anti-suit injunction viability YIG failed to prove probable right/injury with competent evidence Injunction justified to protect venue/jurisdiction Injunction reversed; no competent evidence supported relief
Venue independence under 15.003(a) Yarto/YIG independently established Hidalgo venue; Shamoun failed to show otherwise Venue established by petition and affidavits; Hidalgo proper for Yarto and YIG Hidalgo venue upheld for Yarto and YIG; denial of transfer affirmed
Writ of mandamus under major-transaction rule (15.020) Settlement constituted a major transaction triggering mandatory transfer YIG/Yarto actions not arising from the major transaction; §15.020 inapplicable Mandamus relief denied; §15.020 not applicable to either suit

Key Cases Cited

  • Butnaru v. Ford Motor Co., 84 S.W.3d 198 (Tex. 2002) (standards for granting temporary injunctions; burden of proof)
  • Millwrights Local Union No. 2484 v. Rust Eng’g Co., 433 S.W.2d 683 (Tex. 1968) (necessity of competent evidence for temporary injunctions)
  • Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy, Inc., 159 S.W.3d 615 (Tex. 2005) (anti-suit injunction standards; explicit requirements for equity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Shamoun & Norman, LLP v. Yarto International Group, LP
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: May 31, 2012
Citation: 2012 Tex. App. LEXIS 4384
Docket Number: 13-11-00087-CV, 13-11-00256-CV, 13-11-00281-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.