midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
57 F. Supp. 3d 325
S.D.N.Y.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Leigh Shafir alleges Defendants failed to pay overtime under FLSA and NYLL as an hourly employee.
  • Defendants move to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6).
  • Court converts the motion to summary judgment under Rule 56 because matters outside the pleadings are presented.
  • Plaintiff attached depositions and an affidavit to the Complaint; Defendants attached a declaration and deposition.
  • Court finds extensive evidentiary material available and decides to treat the motion as summary judgment to efficiently resolve the case.
  • Court allows additional discovery and supplemental briefing, set with deadlines for December 5 and December 15, 2014.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the court should convert the 12(b)(6) motion to summary judgment. Shafir: evidence outside pleading supports claims. Defendants: should decide on pleadings only. Yes; convert to summary judgment.
Whether Shafir has Article III standing despite Defendants’ arguments. Shafir has injury from unpaid overtime. No injury or jurisdictional defect shown. Standing exists; issue will be resolved on merits.
Whether overtime entitlement depends on classifying Shafir as hourly employee. Ongoing overtime wages owed if hourly. Classification is a merits issue. Merits-based question to be resolved under Rule 56.
Whether further discovery is appropriate after conversion. Additional discovery could yield relevant facts. Discovery not precluded but needs limits. Parties may conduct additional discovery by specified deadlines.

Key Cases Cited

  • CorteC Indus., Inc. v. Sum Holding L.P., 949 F.2d 42 (2d Cir. 1991) (guides conversion of Rule 12(b)(6) motions when extraneous material is present)
  • Global Network Commc’ns, Inc. v. City of New York, 458 F.3d 150 (2d Cir. 2006) (summary judgment proper to consider outside pleadings)
  • Sellers v. M.C. Floor Crofters, Inc., 842 F.2d 639 (2d Cir. 1988) (court may consider outside materials when converting to summary judgment)
  • Rose v. Bartle, 871 F.2d 331 (3d Cir. 1989) (affidavit attached to complaint constitutes outside pleading material)
  • Zappia Middle East Constr. Co. Ltd. v. Emirate of Abu Dhabi, 215 F.3d 247 (2d Cir. 2000) (standing vs. failure to state a claim; can consider outside evidence for jurisdiction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Shafir v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, S.D. New York
Date Published: Oct 21, 2014
Citations: 57 F. Supp. 3d 325; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 149341; 2014 WL 5343308; No. 12 CIV 5794(MGC)
Docket Number: No. 12 CIV 5794(MGC)
Court Abbreviation: S.D.N.Y.
Log In
    Shafir v. Continuum Health Partners, Inc., 57 F. Supp. 3d 325