SFI LTD. Partnership 53 v. Ray Anderson, Inc.
A-15-1067
| Neb. Ct. App. | Feb 14, 2017Background
- In 2005 SFI LTD. agreed to buy property from Ray Anderson, Inc. for $800,000; the parties closed on February 15, 2006.
- The First Amendment to Purchase Agreement (Feb. 13, 2006) disclosed soil contamination from former underground fuel tanks and required Ray Anderson to remediate specific items (tank removal, soil replacement, termination/modification of Amoco agreements/restrictions, NDEQ "No Further Action" letter, independent soils engineer certification) within set deadlines (most tasks within 90 days; NDEQ letter and certification within 2 years).
- $200,000 of the purchase price was placed in escrow; escrow terms awarded the funds to SFI if remediation deadlines were missed, or to Ray Anderson if remediation was timely completed.
- SFI waited until January 14, 2014 (almost six years after the latest remediation deadline, Feb. 15, 2008) to sue, alleging Ray Anderson breached remediation obligations and seeking the $200,000 in escrow.
- Ray Anderson counterclaimed for the escrow funds and raised defenses including statute of limitations, laches, waiver, and asserted unjust enrichment; the district court granted summary judgment to Ray Anderson on the declaratory/escrow claim, finding SFI’s breach claim time-barred and that SFI waived the escrow conditions by failing to timely sue.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether SFI’s contract breach claim was time‑barred | SFI argued its claim was timely or the agreement waived/extended the statute of limitations | Ray Anderson argued the 5‑year statute for written contracts accrued after the two‑year remediation deadline and SFI filed after 5 years | Court held claim accrued Feb 16, 2008; 5‑year limitations elapsed before Jan 14, 2014 — claim barred |
| Whether paragraph 9 of the First Amendment waived or tolled the statute of limitations | SFI relied on paragraph 9 (no waiver of remedies/delay not a waiver) as an implicit waiver/extension of limitations | Ray Anderson argued paragraph 9 preserves remedies but does not extend or waive statutory limitations; specific escrow/paragraph 12 govern defaults | Court held paragraph 9 does not waive/extend the statute of limitations; such a reading would be absurd and conflicts with specific escrow/paragraph 12 terms |
| Whether SFI waived conditions precedent to payment from escrow by inaction | SFI argued it did not waive conditions and disputed whether remediation was timely completed | Ray Anderson argued SFI’s failure to timely sue and lengthy post‑deadline conduct constituted waiver of conditions precedent | Court held SFI’s lengthy delay (nearly six years) and failure to prosecute constituted an implied waiver of conditions precedent; escrow funds awarded to Ray Anderson |
| Whether summary judgment was appropriate on the escrow/declaratory claim | SFI sought summary judgment to recover escrow funds | Ray Anderson sought summary judgment declaring entitlement to escrow funds given waiver/time bar | Court affirmed summary judgment for Ray Anderson on declaratory/escrow entitlement; denied summary judgment for both on breach claim due to statute‑bar issue resolved as matter of law |
Key Cases Cited
- Weber v. North Loup River Public Power and Irrigation District, 288 Neb. 959, 854 N.W.2d 263 (summary judgment standard and evidence viewed for nonmoving party)
- Irving F. Jensen Co., Inc. v. State, Dept. of Roads, 272 Neb. 162, 719 N.W.2d 716 (appellate review of statute of limitations determinations)
- Hans v. Lucas, 270 Neb. 421, 703 N.W.2d 880 (contract interpretation is a question of law reviewed de novo)
- Timberlake v. Douglas County, 291 Neb. 387, 865 N.W.2d 788 (avoid contract interpretations that yield unreasonable or absurd results)
- National Bank of Commerce Trust & Savings Ass’n v. Ham, 256 Neb. 679, 592 N.W.2d 477 (5‑year limitations for written contracts)
- Snyder v. Case, 259 Neb. 621, 611 N.W.2d 409 (cause of action accrues at time of breach)
- Pearce v. ELIC Corp., 213 Neb. 193, 329 N.W.2d 74 (waiver of contractual rights or conditions precedent may be inferred by conduct)
