midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
191 So. 3d 1090
La.
2016
Read the full case

Background

  • Gordon Serou, Jr. died after hospitalization at SHONO (Touro) following Hurricane Katrina; the suit involved wrongful death and survival claims against Touro, SHONO, and Aggreko, with Aggreko contracted to provide emergency generator services.
  • Touro and Aggreko cross-claimed for indemnification under a contract that required Aggreko to indemnify for claims arising from its equipment and services, to the extent caused by Aggreko’s negligence or fault.
  • Aggreko moved for summary judgment in 2011; the trial court denied it, finding genuine issues of material fact as to whether the generator failed to serve its purpose.
  • The main 2011 trial on the merits allocated 30% fault to Touro and 70% to SHONO, with no fault assigned to Aggreko; Aggreko petitioned higher courts for relief and the matter was remanded on several occasions.
  • In 2014–2015 the trial court again granted Aggreko summary judgment on indemnity grounds, finding Aggreko had no liability; the judgment was affirmed on appeal.
  • The appellate court framed the key issue as whether Aggreko could be liable to indemnify under the contract given the final fault allocation and the law governing summary judgments.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Aggreko is entitled to indemnity against Touro. Touro argues Aggreko’s fault or indebtness should be part of indemnity. Aggreko contends it bears no fault and thus owes no indemnity to Touro. Summary judgment affirmed; Aggreko bears no fault and indemnity not owed.
Whether reconsideration of Aggreko’s second motion for summary judgment was proper despite law-of-the-case concerns. Touro argues law-of-the-case precludes re-urging the motion. The denial or reversal of prior motions allows re-urging when merits permit. Trial court could consider the second motion; law-of-the-case did not bar reconsideration.

Key Cases Cited

  • Serou v. Touro Infirmary, 105 So.3d 1068 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2013) (finality of Serou I; apportionment of fault; indemnity considerations)
  • Serou v. Touro Infirmary, 115 So.3d 688 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2013) (Serou II; genuine issues of material fact remanded)
  • Paragon Lofts Condo. Owners Ass’n, Inc. v. Paragon Lofts, L.L.C., 32 So.3d 303 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2010) (reconsideration of denied summary judgment permissible before trial)
  • Hargett v. Progressive Ins. Co., 996 So.2d 1199 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2008) (second motion for summary judgment permissible)
  • Magallanes v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., 23 So.3d 985 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2009) (proper procedure for reconsideration of summary judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Serou v. Touro Infirmary
Court Name: Supreme Court of Louisiana
Date Published: Apr 13, 2016
Citations: 191 So. 3d 1090; 2016 WL 1449284; 2015 La.App. 4 Cir. 0747; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 702; No. 2015-CA-0747
Docket Number: No. 2015-CA-0747
Court Abbreviation: La.
Log In